Ethics & International Affairs

883 papers and 9.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 883 papers published in Ethics & International Affairs in the last decades have received a total of 9.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Ethics & International Affairs usually cover Political Science and International Relations (496 papers), Sociology and Political Science (345 papers) and Philosophy (181 papers) specifically the topics of Global Peace and Security Dynamics (287 papers), War, Ethics, and Justification (164 papers) and International Law and Human Rights (146 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Ethics & International Affairs are Thomas Pogge, Alex J. Bellamy, Robert O. Keohane, Allen Buchanan, David Schlosberg, Thomas G. Weiss, Amitav Acharya, Daniel Wikler, Mathias Risse and Jeff McMahan.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Ethics & International Affairs

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Ethics & International Affairs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Ethics & International Affairs.

Countries where authors publish in Ethics & International Affairs

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Ethics & International Affairs. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Ethics & International Affairs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ethics & International Affairs more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025