Nicholas Wright

402 citations
9 papers · 285 · h-index 4

Impact in

Papers in

Nicholas Wright

9 papers receiving 263 citations

Peers

Nicholas Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 160
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 28
  • Ecology 39
  • Horticulture 1
  • Physiology 37
Replace Rashmita Bajracharya with:
Rashmita Bajracharya United Kingdom
Boštjan Jakše Slovenia
Chloe E. Panizza United States
Elizabeth D. Mansfield Canada
Dilini Wijesekara United Kingdom
Scott Stoll United States
M. Ramos Spain
Kenny Mendoza-Herrera Mexico
Hong Chuan Loh Malaysia
Noemí Bermúdez-Chillida Spain
Nicholas Wright relative to Rashmita Bajracharya United Kingdom Rashmita Bajracharya's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.8×
Rashmita Bajracharya · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nicholas Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nicholas Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicholas Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicholas Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nicholas Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicholas Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicholas Wright. The network helps show where Nicholas Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Nicholas Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nicholas Wright Line = papers co-authored together Nicholas Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 2017239
2 201913
3 202012
4 201111
5 20223
6 20233
7 20212
8 20201
9 20251

About Nicholas Wright

Nicholas Wright is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Nutrition and Dietetics, Physiology, Health Information Management and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, having authored 9 papers that have together received 285 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nutritional Studies and Diet (7 papers), Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior (2 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (2 papers), Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact (1 paper), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (1 paper), Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins (1 paper), Dietetics, Nutrition, and Education (1 paper) and Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (160 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (28 citations), Ecology (39 citations), Horticulture (1 citation) and Physiology (37 citations). Nicholas Wright has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand and United States. Frequent co-authors include Bruce Bartholow Duncan, Sue Pullon, Gabrielle M. Turner‐McGrievy, George Thomson, Evan M. Forman, Nick Wilson, Christina Chwyl, Brendan Walsh and Meghan L. Butryn. Their work appears in journals such as Nutrients, BMJ Open, Appetite, Maternal and Child Health Journal and Nutrition and Diabetes.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact