Nicholas Trahearn

419 citations
10 papers · 195 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Nicholas Trahearn

10 papers receiving 193 citations

Peers

Nicholas Trahearn
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • Biophysics 42
  • Modeling and Simulation 20
  • Cancer Research 44
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 63
  • Artificial Intelligence 88
Replace Henrik Failmezger with:
Henrik Failmezger Germany
Nicolas Brieu Germany
Yves‐Rémi Van Eycke Belgium
Julian Mattes Germany
W. Meyer Germany
Chiara Maria Lavinia Loeffler Germany
Rebecca Batiste United States
Masoud Mireskandari Germany
Gerald Fontenay United States
Ashley Kiemen United States
Nicholas Trahearn relative to Henrik Failmezger Germany Henrik Failmezger's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Henrik Failmezger · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nicholas Trahearn

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nicholas Trahearn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicholas Trahearn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicholas Trahearn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nicholas Trahearn

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicholas Trahearn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicholas Trahearn. The network helps show where Nicholas Trahearn may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nicholas Trahearn, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nicholas Trahearn Line = papers co-authored together Nicholas Trahearn links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 202076
2 201758
3 201521
4 201717
5 20167
6 20197
7 20144
8
A Discriminative Framework for Stain Deconvolution of Histopathology Images in the Maxwellian Space
20152
9 20252
10
Automated Quantification Of Blood Microvessels In Hematoxylin And Eosin Whole Slide Images
20211

About Nicholas Trahearn

Nicholas Trahearn is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Molecular Biology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Cancer Research, having authored 10 papers that have together received 195 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include AI in cancer detection (5 papers), Medical Image Segmentation Techniques (3 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (2 papers), Digital Imaging for Blood Diseases (2 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (1 paper), Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer (1 paper), Gene expression and cancer classification (1 paper) and Medical Imaging and Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biophysics (42 citations), Modeling and Simulation (20 citations), Cancer Research (44 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (63 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (88 citations). Nicholas Trahearn has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Qatar. Frequent co-authors include Nasir Rajpoot, David Snead, Najah Alsubaie, Shan E Ahmed Raza, Ian A. Cree, Andrea Sottoriva, Carlo C. Maley, Iros Barozzi, Ahmet Acar and Nicola Valeri. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, Scientific Reports, PLoS ONE, EBioMedicine and Cytometry Part A.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact