Nicholas Pound

34 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Nicholas Pound
Comparison fields: 5 of 137
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.0k
  • Occupational Therapy 209
  • Rehabilitation 283
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 525
  • Marketing 213
Replace Robert G. Turner with:
Robert G. Turner United States
Miguel Ángel Serrano Spain
Samuele Zilioli United States
Johannes Hönekopp United Kingdom
Helen J. Chatterjee United Kingdom
John Van Borsel Belgium
Katherine Verdolini United States
Mara Behlau Brazil
Katherine M. Kirk Australia
Kirsten M. Poehlmann United States
Nicholas Pound relative to Robert G. Turner United States Robert G. Turner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.5×
Robert G. Turner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nicholas Pound

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nicholas Pound's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicholas Pound with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicholas Pound more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nicholas Pound

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicholas Pound. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicholas Pound. The network helps show where Nicholas Pound may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nicholas Pound, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nicholas Pound Line = papers co-authored together Nicholas Pound links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006218
2 2008161
3 2005154
4 2012153
5 2000138
6 2010135
7 2004106
8 199694
9 201288
10 200466
11 200865
12 201463
13 200463
14 200254
15 199650
16 200750
17 200249
18 201349
19 200539
20 201738

About Nicholas Pound

Nicholas Pound is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and Social Psychology, having authored 34 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (20 papers), Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management (4 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (4 papers), Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (4 papers), Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies (4 papers), Media, Gender, and Advertising (3 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (3 papers) and Crime Patterns and Interventions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.0k citations), Occupational Therapy (209 citations), Rehabilitation (283 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (525 citations) and Marketing (213 citations). Nicholas Pound has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ian S. Penton‐Voak, William Jeffcoate, David I. Perrett, Frances L. Game, K. A. Treece, Nigel Sturrock, Isabel M. Scott, Anthony C. Little, Alison K. Surridge and Aaron Sell. Their work appears in journals such as Diabetic Medicine, PLoS ONE, Evolution and Human Behavior, Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences and Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact