Nicholas Pound

37 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Nicholas Pound
Comparison fields: 5 of 138
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.1k
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 518
  • Occupational Therapy 113
  • Rehabilitation 163
  • Marketing 222
Replace Robert G. Turner with:
Robert G. Turner United States
Samuele Zilioli United States
Johannes Hönekopp United Kingdom
Bogusław Pawłowski Poland
George Grouios Greece
Miguel Ángel Serrano Spain
John Van Borsel Belgium
Susan F. Lipson United States
Kirsten M. Poehlmann United States
Amanda Hahn United Kingdom
Nicholas Pound relative to Robert G. Turner United States Robert G. Turner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.3×
Robert G. Turner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nicholas Pound

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nicholas Pound's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicholas Pound with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicholas Pound more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nicholas Pound

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicholas Pound. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicholas Pound. The network helps show where Nicholas Pound may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nicholas Pound, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nicholas Pound Line = papers co-authored together Nicholas Pound links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006228
2 2008173
3 2012173
4 2005161
5 2000141
6 2010139
7 2004111
8 1996103
9 201294
10 200873
11 200272
12 200471
13 200269
14 200468
15 201467
16 201353
17 200753
18 199652
19 200547
20 200246

About Nicholas Pound

Nicholas Pound is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, having authored 37 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (23 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (5 papers), Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies (4 papers), Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (4 papers), Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management (4 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (3 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (3 papers) and Animal Behavior and Reproduction (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.1k citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (518 citations), Occupational Therapy (113 citations), Rehabilitation (163 citations) and Marketing (222 citations). Nicholas Pound has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ian S. Penton‐Voak, William Jeffcoate, David I. Perrett, Frances L. Game, K. A. Treece, Nigel Sturrock, Isabel M. Scott, Liana S. E. Hone, Alison K. Surridge and Aaron Sell. Their work appears in journals such as Diabetic Medicine, Evolution and Human Behavior, PLoS ONE, Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences and Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact