Nicholas Howe
Impact in
- Classics top 2%
- Medieval Literature and History
- Byzantine Studies and History
- Literature and Literary Theory top 10%
- Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
Papers in
- Classics 13
- Medieval Literature and History 13
-
- Linguistics and language evolution 4
- Co-authors
- Robin Fleming (1 shared paper)Irving Howe (1 shared paper)Nancy N. Diehl (1 shared paper)Tammeza Gibson (1 shared paper)Michael G. Heckman (1 shared paper)Barbara A. Pockaj (1 shared paper)E. Talbot Donaldson (1 shared paper)Sarah A. McLaughlin (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Speculum (3 papers)Research in African Literatures (3 papers)Notes and Queries (1 paper)The American Historical Review (1 paper)Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Nicholas Howe
17 papers receiving 119 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- Classics 72
- Literature and Literary Theory 50
- History 43
- Language and Linguistics 43
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 54
Countries citing papers authored by Nicholas Howe
This map shows the geographic impact of Nicholas Howe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicholas Howe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicholas Howe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nicholas Howe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicholas Howe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicholas Howe. The network helps show where Nicholas Howe may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 10 scholars most cited alongside Nicholas Howe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1988 | 76 | |
| 2 | 2009 | 24 | |
| 3 | The old English catalogue poems | 1985 | 19 |
| 4 | 1985 | 15 | |
| 5 | 2004 | 11 | |
| 6 | Conversion and Colonization in Anglo-Saxon England | 2006 | 10 |
| 7 | 2013 | 4 | |
| 8 | 2002 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2000 | 3 | |
| 10 | 1989 | 3 | |
| 11 | 1983 | 3 | |
| 12 | 1991 | 2 | |
| 13 | 1974 | 2 | |
| 14 | A critic's notebook | 1994 | 2 |
| 15 | 2003 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2001 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1993 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1998 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2001 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2000 | 1 |
About Nicholas Howe
Nicholas Howe is a scholar working on Classics, Language and Linguistics, Anthropology, Literature and Literary Theory and History, having authored 25 papers that have together received 186 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval Literature and History (13 papers), Linguistics and language evolution (4 papers), Historical and Archaeological Studies (2 papers), Breast Implant and Reconstruction (1 paper), Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (1 paper), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (1 paper), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (1 paper) and American and British Literature Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (72 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (50 citations), History (43 citations), Language and Linguistics (43 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (54 citations). Nicholas Howe has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Robin Fleming, Irving Howe, Nancy N. Diehl, Tammeza Gibson, Michael G. Heckman, Barbara A. Pockaj, E. Talbot Donaldson, Sarah A. McLaughlin, Laura A. Vallow and Sanjay P. Bagaria. Their work appears in journals such as Speculum, Research in African Literatures, Notes and Queries, The American Historical Review and Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.