Mark Amsler

668 citations
18 papers · 297 · h-index 7

Impact in

  • Classics top 5%
    • Medieval Literature and History
    • Byzantine Studies and History
  • Philosophy top 5%
    • Classical Philosophy and Thought
    • Medieval and Classical Philosophy

Papers in

Mark Amsler

16 papers receiving 170 citations

Peers

Mark Amsler
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Classics 104
  • Philosophy 94
  • History 72
  • Anthropology 59
  • Language and Linguistics 42
Replace Jean‐Claude Schmitt with:
Jean‐Claude Schmitt France
Alain Boureau France
Peter Dinzelbacher Germany
Michael D. Bailey United States
Janet Gurkin Altman United States
Paolo Valesio Italy
Jean-Claude Schmitt France
C. Stephen Jaeger United States
Timothy J. Reiss United States
Heather Dubrow United States
Mark Amsler relative to Jean‐Claude Schmitt France Jean‐Claude Schmitt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.1×
Jean‐Claude Schmitt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Amsler

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Amsler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Amsler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Amsler more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Amsler

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Amsler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Amsler. The network helps show where Mark Amsler may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Mark Amsler, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Amsler Line = papers co-authored together Mark Amsler links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 198999
2 198570
3 200147
4 201530
5
Affective Literacies: Writing and Multilingualism in the Late Middle Ages
201011
6 19899
7 20017
8 20125
9 19794
10
The Languages of creativity : models, problem-solving, discourse
19864
11 20193
12
Imagining unthinkable spaces
20132
13 19932
14 19902
15 20021
16 20191
17
Metamorphosis: The Changing Face of Ovid
20100
18 20210

About Mark Amsler

Mark Amsler is a scholar working on Classics, Language and Linguistics, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, History and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 18 papers that have together received 297 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval Literature and History (6 papers), Historical Linguistics and Language Studies (4 papers), Foucault, Power, and Ethics (2 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (2 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (2 papers), History of Medicine Studies (1 paper), Digital Education and Society (1 paper) and Linguistic Variation and Morphology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (104 citations), Philosophy (94 citations), History (72 citations), Anthropology (59 citations) and Language and Linguistics (42 citations). Mark Amsler has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand and United States. Frequent co-authors include Malcolm B. Schofield, Martha C. Nussbaum, Cris Shore, Elmer H. Duncan and Sarah Amsler. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian review of comparative literature, Leonardo, Language, Discourse Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education and Historiographia Linguistica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact