Nicholas E. Lea

597 citations
8 papers · 351 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

    • Rabies epidemiology and control 4
    • Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques 2
    • Cell Image Analysis Techniques 2

Nicholas E. Lea

8 papers receiving 347 citations

Peers

Nicholas E. Lea
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 129
  • Virology 28
  • Biophysics 34
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 97
  • Neurology 26
Replace Ana González-Rueda with:
Ana González-Rueda United Kingdom
Masahito Kuramochi Japan
Sandy Ibanes France
Antonio Trabalza United Kingdom
Cantin Ortiz Sweden
Benedetto Romoli United States
Katherine R. Croce United States
Thomas K. Lavin United States
Adrienne C. Philson United States
L. Court France
Nicholas E. Lea relative to Ana González-Rueda United Kingdom Ana González-Rueda's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.3×
Ana González-Rueda · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nicholas E. Lea

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nicholas E. Lea's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicholas E. Lea with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicholas E. Lea more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nicholas E. Lea

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicholas E. Lea. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicholas E. Lea. The network helps show where Nicholas E. Lea may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nicholas E. Lea, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nicholas E. Lea Line = papers co-authored together Nicholas E. Lea links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 2018120
2 202272
3 202161
4 202045
5 201733
6 20238
7 20236
8 20246

About Nicholas E. Lea

Nicholas E. Lea is a scholar working on Virology, Biophysics, Genetics, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Molecular Biology, having authored 8 papers that have together received 351 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Rabies epidemiology and control (4 papers), Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques (2 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (2 papers), Mosquito-borne diseases and control (2 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2 papers), Cell Image Analysis Techniques (2 papers), Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior (1 paper) and Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (129 citations), Virology (28 citations), Biophysics (34 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (97 citations) and Neurology (26 citations). Nicholas E. Lea has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Hong Kong and China. Frequent co-authors include Ian R. Wickersham, Thomas K. Lavin, Lei Jin, Arianne M. Babina, Michelle M. Meyer, Heather A. Sullivan, Yuanyuan Hou, Guoping Feng, Tomomi Aida and Dheeraj S. Roy. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Neuroscience, Neuron, Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience, Nature and mBio.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact