Michael Hauskeller
Impact in
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Philosophy top 5%
- Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction
Papers in
-
- Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations 17
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment 4
- Philosophy 12
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 3
- Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel 3
- Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism 3
Michael Hauskeller
42 papers receiving 269 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Cognitive Neuroscience 153
- Philosophy 43
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 59
- History and Philosophy of Science 16
- Aging 6
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Hauskeller
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Hauskeller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Hauskeller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Hauskeller more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Hauskeller
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Hauskeller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Hauskeller. The network helps show where Michael Hauskeller may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 2 scholars most cited alongside Michael Hauskeller, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 36 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 33 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 25 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 19 | |
| 5 | 2005 | 18 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 17 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 17 | |
| 8 | 2012 | 13 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 13 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 11 | |
| 11 | Biotechnology and the Integrity of Life: Taking Public Fears Seriously | 2007 | 11 |
| 12 | 2019 | 8 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 8 | |
| 14 | 2011 | 7 | |
| 15 | Seni-apa itu?; posisi estetika dari Platon sampai Danto | 2015 | 7 |
| 16 | How to Become a Post-Dog. Animals in Transhumanism | 2017 | 6 |
| 17 | 2011 | 5 | |
| 18 | 2009 | 5 | |
| 19 | 2007 | 5 | |
| 20 | Handeln zugunsten anderer. Eine moralphilosophische Untersuchung | 2002 | 4 |
About Michael Hauskeller
Michael Hauskeller is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions and Astronomy and Astrophysics, having authored 55 papers that have together received 310 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (17 papers), Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life (4 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (4 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (3 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (3 papers), Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel (3 papers), Ethics in medical practice (3 papers) and Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (153 citations), Philosophy (43 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (59 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (16 citations) and Aging (6 citations). Michael Hauskeller has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Christoph Rehmann‐Sutter and Brian D. Earp. Their work appears in journals such as Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, The Hastings Center Report, Scientia et Fides, Inquiry and Philosophy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.