Neville Prentice

47 papers receiving 743 citations

Peers

Neville Prentice
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Animal Science and Zoology 227
  • Biotechnology 136
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 212
  • Food Science 202
  • Plant Science 393
Replace G. C. Mustakas with:
G. C. Mustakas United States
Polly D. Courtney United States
F.W. Douglas United States
Hwa L. Wang United States
J. Fernández‐Salguero Spain
Walter A. Pons United States
Carl S. Pederson United States
Gianfranco Piva Italy
Valdir Augusto Neves Brazil
John P. Cherry United States
Neville Prentice relative to G. C. Mustakas United States G. C. Mustakas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
G. C. Mustakas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Neville Prentice

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Neville Prentice's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neville Prentice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neville Prentice more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Neville Prentice

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Neville Prentice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Neville Prentice. The network helps show where Neville Prentice may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Neville Prentice, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Neville Prentice Line = papers co-authored together Neville Prentice links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1983108
2 198186
3 197566
4 198049
5
Enzymic analysis of beta-D-glucans in cereal grains.
198042
6 196841
7
High-fiber bread containing brewer's spent grain.
197738
8 197027
9 195926
10 196225
11 197924
12 196023
13 197022
14 197921
15 197520
16 196819
17 195616
18 197216
19 198015
20 197015

About Neville Prentice

Neville Prentice is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Biotechnology, Food Science and Animal Science and Zoology, having authored 48 papers that have together received 873 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Protein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides (13 papers), Phytase and its Applications (9 papers), Enzyme Production and Characterization (8 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (6 papers), Food composition and properties (5 papers), Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (5 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (4 papers) and Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Animal Science and Zoology (227 citations), Biotechnology (136 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (212 citations), Food Science (202 citations) and Plant Science (393 citations). Neville Prentice has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Philippines. Frequent co-authors include W. C. Burger, Asaf A. Qureshi, Margaret Sunde, J A Marlett, H.R. Bird, F S Chu, B.L. D'Appolonia, Chuan-Chia Chang, Samy H. Ashoor and A. D. Dickson. Their work appears in journals such as Phytochemistry, Journal of the American Society of Brewing Chemists, Physiologia Plantarum, Journal of Nutrition and Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact