Netta Harries

19 papers receiving 295 citations

Peers

Netta Harries
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 256
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 46
  • Rehabilitation 54
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 139
  • Clinical Psychology 114
Replace Amy Bodkin with:
Amy Bodkin United States
Inge Franki Belgium
Rannei Sæther Norway
Hsiu‐Ching Chiu Taiwan
Adriana Neves dos Santos Brazil
Sandy Saavedra United States
Shamekh El-Shamy Egypt
Won‐Ho Kim South Korea
Siri Merete Brændvik Norway
Josse De Cat Belgium
Netta Harries relative to Amy Bodkin United States Amy Bodkin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Amy Bodkin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Netta Harries

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Netta Harries's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Netta Harries with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Netta Harries more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Netta Harries

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Netta Harries. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Netta Harries. The network helps show where Netta Harries may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Netta Harries, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Netta Harries Line = papers co-authored together Netta Harries links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 200657
2 201043
3 201437
4
Changes over years in gross motor function of 3-8 year old children with cerebral palsy: using the Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-88).
200428
5 200421
6 201817
7 201315
8 200814
9 200913
10 201412
11 201612
12 201311
13 202111
14 20078
15 20197
16 20073
17 20143
18 20093
19 20013
20 20012

About Netta Harries

Netta Harries is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Clinical Psychology, Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation and Neurology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 320 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (17 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (10 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (8 papers), Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (5 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (4 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (3 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (2 papers) and Neurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (256 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (46 citations), Rehabilitation (54 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (139 citations) and Clinical Psychology (114 citations). Netta Harries has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, Jordan and United States. Frequent co-authors include Simona Bar‐Haim, Mark Belokopytov, Eli Lahat, J. Kaplanski, Muhammed Al-Jarrah, Jack A. Loeppky, Amir Karniel, Yeshayahu Hutzler, Neil J. Perkins and Hagar Patish. Their work appears in journals such as Disability and Rehabilitation, Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, Gait & Posture, Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology and Pediatric Exercise Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact