Neil King

21 papers receiving 364 citations

Peers

Neil King
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 101
  • Human-Computer Interaction 87
  • Occupational Therapy 44
  • Gender Studies 79
  • Life-span and Life-course Studies 4
Replace Laurence Habib with:
Laurence Habib Norway
Michela Cozza Sweden
Marty Bray United States
Jennison V. Asuncion Canada
Gareth E. Miles United Kingdom
Susan E. Crichton Canada
Eun-Ok Baek United States
Sandra Schamroth Abrams United States
Chris Davies United Kingdom
María A. Rodríguez‐Manzanares Canada
Neil King relative to Laurence Habib Norway Laurence Habib's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8.8×
Laurence Habib · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Neil King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Neil King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neil King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neil King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Neil King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Neil King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Neil King. The network helps show where Neil King may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Neil King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Neil King Line = papers co-authored together Neil King links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006129
2 201746
3
Sport Policy and Governance: local perspectives
200938
4 201432
5 201324
6 201321
7 200414
8 200413
9
Sport Governance: An introduction
201612
10 201610
11 20078
12 20197
13 20037
14
Web Accessibility Revealed: The Museums, Libraries and Archives Council Audit
20056
15 20065
16 20114
17
Local authority cuts loom large over community sport
20153
18 20192
19 20162
20 20242

About Neil King

Neil King is a scholar working on Human Factors and Ergonomics, Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science, Human-Computer Interaction and Demography, having authored 22 papers that have together received 386 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (11 papers), Digital Accessibility for Disabilities (7 papers), Sports, Gender, and Society (4 papers), Usability and User Interface Design (3 papers), Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (3 papers), Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management (2 papers), Technology Use by Older Adults (2 papers) and Software Engineering Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Human Factors and Ergonomics (101 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (87 citations), Occupational Therapy (44 citations), Gender Studies (79 citations) and Life-span and Life-course Studies (4 citations). Neil King has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Helen Petrie, Fraser Hamilton, Paul Widdop, Peter Millward, Daniel Parnell, David Cutts, Panayiotis Zaphiris, Anne-Marie (O'Neill) Burn, Carlos A. Velasco and Martin Lorenz. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, World Leisure Journal, New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, International Journal of Public Sector Management and Lecture notes in computer science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact