Ned Scott
Impact in
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- COVID-19 and Mental Health
- Eating Disorders and Behaviors
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
-
- Sleep and related disorders
- Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Papers in
-
- Eating Disorders and Behaviors 2
- Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders 1
-
- Reading and Literacy Development 1
- Co-authors
- Debra A. Dunstan (4 shared papers)Tanya L. Hanstock (2 shared papers)Chris Thornton (1 shared paper)Louisa M. Slowiaczek (1 shared paper)Todd A. Kahan (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- BMC Psychiatry (3 papers)Depression Research and Treatment (1 paper)Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (1 paper)Clinical Case Studies (1 paper)Journal of Eating Disorders (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Ned Scott
6 papers receiving 908 citations
Ned Scott's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
- Clinical Psychology 192
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 77
- Psychiatry and Mental health 76
- Biological Psychiatry 11
- Applied Psychology 17
Countries citing papers authored by Ned Scott
This map shows the geographic impact of Ned Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ned Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ned Scott more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ned Scott
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ned Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ned Scott. The network helps show where Ned Scott may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Ned Scott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Norms for Zung’s Self-rating Anxiety Scale Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 380 |
| 2 | Screening for anxiety and depression: reassessing the utility of the Zung scales Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 339 |
| 3 | 2019 | 137 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 42 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 16 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 13 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 0 |
About Ned Scott
Ned Scott is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Insect Science, having authored 7 papers that have together received 927 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Eating Disorders and Behaviors (2 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (1 paper), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (1 paper), Reading and Literacy Development (1 paper), Humor Studies and Applications (1 paper) and Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (192 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (77 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (76 citations), Biological Psychiatry (11 citations) and Applied Psychology (17 citations). Ned Scott has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Debra A. Dunstan, Tanya L. Hanstock, Chris Thornton, Louisa M. Slowiaczek and Todd A. Kahan. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Psychiatry, Depression Research and Treatment, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Clinical Case Studies and Journal of Eating Disorders.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.