Nazif Ullah

43 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Nazif Ullah
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 146
  • Drug Discovery 3
  • Pharmacology 113
  • Biochemistry 74
  • Plant Science 416
Replace Ihsan‐ul Haq with:
Ihsan‐ul Haq Pakistan
Shaza M. Al‐Massarani Saudi Arabia
Amal Alotaibi Saudi Arabia
Arifullah Mohammed Malaysia
Essam Nageh Sholkamy Saudi Arabia
P. Brindha India
Abdi Wira Septama Indonesia
Anjali Priyadarshini India
Nur Kartinee Kassim Malaysia
Muhammad Hanafi Indonesia
Nazif Ullah relative to Ihsan‐ul Haq Pakistan Ihsan‐ul Haq's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Ihsan‐ul Haq · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nazif Ullah

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nazif Ullah's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nazif Ullah with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nazif Ullah more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nazif Ullah

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nazif Ullah. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nazif Ullah. The network helps show where Nazif Ullah may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nazif Ullah, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nazif Ullah Line = papers co-authored together Nazif Ullah links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019135
2 2014114
3
Antioxidant and Cytotoxic Activities and Phytochemical Analysis of Euphorbia wallichii Root Extract and its Fractions.
2012110
4 202087
5 201563
6 201656
7 201654
8 201344
9 201842
10
Antitumor, cytotoxic and antioxidant potential of Aster thomsonii extracts
201141
11 201930
12 201927
13 201826
14 202125
15 202025
16 201324
17 202222
18 201720
19 202318
20 201918

About Nazif Ullah

Nazif Ullah is a scholar working on Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Organic Chemistry and Complementary and alternative medicine, having authored 44 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Research on Leishmaniasis Studies (12 papers), Plant tissue culture and regeneration (6 papers), Insect Pest Control Strategies (5 papers), Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies (4 papers), Trypanosoma species research and implications (4 papers), Transgenic Plants and Applications (4 papers), Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (4 papers) and Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (146 citations), Drug Discovery (3 citations), Pharmacology (113 citations), Biochemistry (74 citations) and Plant Science (416 citations). Nazif Ullah has collaborated with scholars based in Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Mubarak Ali Khan, Bushra Mirza, Tariq Khan, Akhtar Nadhman, Zia‐ur‐Rehman Mashwani, Laila Jafri, Samreen Saleem, Ihsan‐ul‐Haq, Simab Kanwal and Huma Ali. Their work appears in journals such as Phytotherapy Research, Arabian Journal of Chemistry, Frontiers in Plant Science, Inorganica Chimica Acta and Toxicology and Industrial Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact