Naved Ahmad

47 papers receiving 337 citations

Peers

Naved Ahmad
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Library and Information Sciences 32
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 76
  • Health Informatics 10
  • Information Systems 109
  • Economics and Econometrics 119
Replace Ding Ding with:
Ding Ding Singapore
Oskar Josef Gstrein Netherlands
Matthew Scherer United States
Federico Casolari Italy
Orla Lynskey United Kingdom
Zehra Taşkın Türkiye
Daniel Agbaji United States
Marcus Smith Australia
Liying Yang China
Raphaël Gellert Netherlands
Naved Ahmad relative to Ding Ding Singapore Ding Ding's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×
Ding Ding · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Naved Ahmad

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Naved Ahmad's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Naved Ahmad with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Naved Ahmad more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Naved Ahmad

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Naved Ahmad. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Naved Ahmad. The network helps show where Naved Ahmad may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Naved Ahmad, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Naved Ahmad Line = papers co-authored together Naved Ahmad links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199548
2 200926
3 201024
4 202223
5 198422
6 202219
7
Information seeking behaviour of the students at Ajmal Khan Tibbiya College, Aligarh Muslim University: a survey
200818
8
Corruption and financial sector performance: A cross-country analysis
201018
9
The Long-run and Short-run Endogeneity of Money Supply in Pakistan: An Empirical Investigation
200616
10 202212
11 200412
12 200911
13 200111
14 202311
15 201910
16 20239
17 20059
18 20259
19 20248
20 20247

About Naved Ahmad

Naved Ahmad is a scholar working on Information Systems, Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 57 papers that have together received 409 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corruption and Economic Development (8 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (6 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (5 papers), Online and Blended Learning (3 papers), Face and Expression Recognition (3 papers), Economic Growth and Development (3 papers), scientometrics and bibliometrics research (3 papers) and Fiscal Policies and Political Economy (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Library and Information Sciences (32 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (76 citations), Health Informatics (10 citations), Information Systems (109 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (119 citations). Naved Ahmad has collaborated with scholars based in India, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan. Frequent co-authors include Nishat Fatima, Shahid Ali, Shahid Ali, Sobur Ali, Senjuti Kabir, A Subaveerapandiyan, Jalaluddin Khan, Mohammad Shahid, Ghufran Ahmad Khan and Amin Ul Haq. Their work appears in journals such as DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, Information Development, Libri, Sustainability and IEEE Access.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact