Nathaniel Chafee

735 citations
12 papers · 481 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Nathaniel Chafee

12 papers receiving 415 citations

Peers

Nathaniel Chafee
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Numerical Analysis 94
  • Applied Mathematics 163
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 157
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 103
  • Control and Systems Engineering 189
Replace T. Yoshizawa with:
T. Yoshizawa Japan
Bernd Aulbach Germany
В. А. Плисс Russia
Al Kelley United States
Charles J. Holland United States
Masaya Yamaguti Japan
太郎 吉沢
M. L. Cartwright United States
Waldyr M. Oliva Brazil
S.-N. Chow United States
Nathaniel Chafee relative to T. Yoshizawa Japan T. Yoshizawa's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
T. Yoshizawa · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nathaniel Chafee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathaniel Chafee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathaniel Chafee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathaniel Chafee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathaniel Chafee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathaniel Chafee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathaniel Chafee. The network helps show where Nathaniel Chafee may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Nathaniel Chafee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nathaniel Chafee Line = papers co-authored together Nathaniel Chafee links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 1974213
2 197589
3 197164
4 196843
5 197521
6 197420
7 197410
8
19789
9 19874
10 19934
11 19773
12 20001

About Nathaniel Chafee

Nathaniel Chafee is a scholar working on Applied Mathematics, Control and Systems Engineering, Numerical Analysis, Mathematical Physics and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 12 papers that have together received 481 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stability and Controllability of Differential Equations (5 papers), Nonlinear Differential Equations Analysis (4 papers), Quantum chaos and dynamical systems (2 papers), Numerical methods for differential equations (2 papers), Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering (2 papers), Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations (2 papers), Differential Equations and Boundary Problems (2 papers) and Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Numerical Analysis (94 citations), Applied Mathematics (163 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (157 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (103 citations) and Control and Systems Engineering (189 citations). Nathaniel Chafee has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include E. F. Infante and D. Bessis. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Differential Equations, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, Physica D Nonlinear Phenomena, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society and Mathematics and Computers in Simulation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact