Nathan Winquist
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 1%
- Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- COVID-19 and Mental Health
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Papers in
-
- Digital Mental Health Interventions 5
-
- Mental Health Research Topics 4
- Co-authors
- Emily G. Lattie (7 shared papers)Colleen Stiles‐Shields (3 shared papers)Andrea K. Graham (2 shared papers)Elizabeth C Adkins (1 shared paper)Q. Eileen Wafford (1 shared paper)Katherine Cohen (2 shared papers)Sarah Ketchen Lipson (1 shared paper)Daniel Eisenberg (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Lupus (1 paper)Journal of Medical Internet Research (1 paper)Psychiatric Services (1 paper)JMIR Mental Health (1 paper)BMC Psychiatry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Nathan Winquist
7 papers receiving 606 citations
Nathan Winquist's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
- Applied Psychology 355
- Clinical Psychology 288
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 165
- Social Psychology 190
- General Health Professions 145
Countries citing papers authored by Nathan Winquist
This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan Winquist's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan Winquist with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan Winquist more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan Winquist
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan Winquist. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan Winquist. The network helps show where Nathan Winquist may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 22 scholars most cited alongside Nathan Winquist, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Digital Mental Health Interventions for Depression, Anxiety, and Enhancement of Psychological Well-Being Among College Students: Systematic Review Hit paper breakdown → | 2019 | 448 |
| 2 | 2020 | 53 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 48 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 33 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 29 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 11 | |
| 7 | 2024 | 2 |
About Nathan Winquist
Nathan Winquist is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 7 papers that have together received 624 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Mental Health Interventions (5 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (4 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (3 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (2 papers), Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (1 paper), Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research (1 paper), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (1 paper) and Endometriosis Research and Treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (355 citations), Clinical Psychology (288 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (165 citations), Social Psychology (190 citations) and General Health Professions (145 citations). Nathan Winquist has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Emily G. Lattie, Colleen Stiles‐Shields, Andrea K. Graham, Elizabeth C Adkins, Q. Eileen Wafford, Katherine Cohen, Sarah Ketchen Lipson, Daniel Eisenberg, Kathryn E. Ringland and Madhu Reddy. Their work appears in journals such as Lupus, Journal of Medical Internet Research, Psychiatric Services, JMIR Mental Health and BMC Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.