Nathan Curtis
Impact in
-
- Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
-
- Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Papers in
- Co-authors
- G. A. Osborne (2 shared papers)Nader Francis (21 shared papers)Glenda E. Rudkin (2 shared papers)Fergus Noble (4 shared papers)James Byrne (3 shared papers)Ian Bailey (3 shared papers)Jake Foster (4 shared papers)Jamie Kelly (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Surgical Endoscopy (7 papers)Colorectal Disease (4 papers)International Journal of Colorectal Disease (3 papers)British journal of surgery (2 papers)Annals of Surgery (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Nathan Curtis
37 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 163
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 65
- Surgery 443
- Developmental Neuroscience 37
- Oncology 202
Countries citing papers authored by Nathan Curtis
This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan Curtis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan Curtis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan Curtis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan Curtis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan Curtis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan Curtis. The network helps show where Nathan Curtis may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nathan Curtis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1991 | 126 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 94 | |
| 3 | 1991 | 77 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 74 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 69 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 67 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 45 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 41 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 40 | |
| 10 | 2023 | 36 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 34 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 34 | |
| 13 | 2018 | 33 | |
| 14 | 2018 | 32 | |
| 15 | 2021 | 30 | |
| 16 | 2010 | 27 | |
| 17 | 2019 | 25 | |
| 18 | 2019 | 22 | |
| 19 | 2017 | 19 | |
| 20 | 2022 | 18 |
About Nathan Curtis
Nathan Curtis is a scholar working on Surgery, Oncology, Molecular Biology, Biomedical Engineering and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 38 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (4 papers), Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (4 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (3 papers), Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment (3 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (2 papers), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (2 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (2 papers) and Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (163 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (65 citations), Surgery (443 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (37 citations) and Oncology (202 citations). Nathan Curtis has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include G. A. Osborne, Nader Francis, Glenda E. Rudkin, Fergus Noble, James Byrne, Ian Bailey, Jake Foster, Jamie Kelly, Tim Underwood and George B. Hanna. Their work appears in journals such as Surgical Endoscopy, Colorectal Disease, International Journal of Colorectal Disease, British journal of surgery and Annals of Surgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.