Jonathan Ockrim

724 citations
15 papers · 409 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Jonathan Ockrim

15 papers receiving 398 citations

Peers

Jonathan Ockrim
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Health Informatics 8
  • Surgery 225
  • Oncology 98
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 71
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 4
Replace Andrew Allison with:
Andrew Allison United Kingdom
Nigel Mark Bagnall United Kingdom
Giovanni Alfonso Chiariello Italy
Piotr Duchnowski Poland
Shyam Menon United Kingdom
Reza Arsalani‐Zadeh United Kingdom
Milovan Petrović Serbia
Ah Ran Oh South Korea
Jacopo Crippa Italy
Guowei Kim Singapore
Jonathan Ockrim relative to Andrew Allison United Kingdom Andrew Allison's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Andrew Allison · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Ockrim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Ockrim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Ockrim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Ockrim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Ockrim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Ockrim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Ockrim. The network helps show where Jonathan Ockrim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Ockrim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Ockrim Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Ockrim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 201294
2 201645
3 201543
4 201440
5 201533
6 201832
7
Complete laparoscopic management of cholecystocutaneous fistula.
200726
8 201925
9 200921
10 201719
11 202012
12 20198
13 20188
14
Deviation and failure of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) following laparoscopic surgery: An early prediction model
20122
15 20111

About Jonathan Ockrim

Jonathan Ockrim is a scholar working on Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology and Biochemistry, having authored 15 papers that have together received 409 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (7 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (2 papers), Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (2 papers), Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (2 papers), Blood transfusion and management (1 paper), Congenital Anomalies and Fetal Surgery (1 paper) and Biliary and Gastrointestinal Fistulas (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (8 citations), Surgery (225 citations), Oncology (98 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (71 citations) and Medical Laboratory Technology (4 citations). Jonathan Ockrim has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Nader Francis, Andrew Allison, Neil Smart, Paul White, Robin H. Kennedy, Emad Salib, Richard Dalton, Nathan Curtis, David Messenger and George B. Hanna. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Colorectal Disease, Techniques in Coloproctology, Surgical Endoscopy, Colorectal Disease and Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact