Nathan Cross

1.3k citations
41 papers · 844 · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Nathan Cross

36 papers receiving 840 citations

Peers

Nathan Cross
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 341
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 144
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 333
  • Physiology 273
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 65
Replace Roland Popp with:
Roland Popp Germany
Crover Kwok Wah Ho Hong Kong
Cameron Harris United States
Kateřina Červená Czechia
Jean‐Pol Lanquart Belgium
Cinzia Castronovo Italy
J. Zulley Germany
Kristine A. Wilckens United States
Fabrice Espa France
J. Staedt Germany
Nathan Cross relative to Roland Popp Germany Roland Popp's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Roland Popp · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nathan Cross

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan Cross's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan Cross with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan Cross more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan Cross

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan Cross. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan Cross. The network helps show where Nathan Cross may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nathan Cross, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nathan Cross Line = papers co-authored together Nathan Cross links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201564
2 201864
3 201664
4 201958
5 201558
6 201751
7 201749
8 202040
9 201934
10 202033
11 201330
12 202229
13 202227
14 201927
15 201724
16 202223
17 201920
18 202018
19 201617
20 202115

About Nathan Cross

Nathan Cross is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Physiology, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 41 papers that have together received 844 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sleep and related disorders (19 papers), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (14 papers), Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research (13 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (5 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (4 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (3 papers), Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue (3 papers) and Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (341 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (144 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (333 citations), Physiology (273 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (65 citations). Nathan Cross has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ronald R. Grunstein, Sharon L. Naismith, Thien Thanh Dang‐Vu, Shantel L. Duffy, Simon J.G. Lewis, A D’Rozario, Ian B. Hickie, Delwyn J. Bartlett, Keith Wong and Zoë Terpening. Their work appears in journals such as Sleep Medicine, SLEEP, Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, Journal of Alzheimer s Disease and Neuropsychology Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact