Nathan Clay
Impact in
-
- Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
- Agricultural Innovations and Practices
- Soil Science top 10%
- Agricultural risk and resilience
Papers in
-
- Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development 8
- Agricultural Innovations and Practices 2
-
- Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management 5
- Co-authors
- Jamie Lorimer (2 shared papers)Tara Garnett (2 shared papers)Brian King (1 shared paper)Karl S. Zimmerer (1 shared paper)Alexandra Sexton (1 shared paper)Xiaotao Jiang (1 shared paper)Karen Charlton (1 shared paper)Anita Stefoska‐Needham (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Rural Studies (2 papers)Geoforum (2 papers)Agriculture and Human Values (1 paper)AMBIO (1 paper)Annals of the American Association of Geographers (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesSweden
In The Last Decade
Nathan Clay
14 papers receiving 511 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
- General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 166
- Soil Science 60
- Ecology 146
- Geography, Planning and Development 29
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 102
Countries citing papers authored by Nathan Clay
This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan Clay's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan Clay with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan Clay more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan Clay
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan Clay. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan Clay. The network helps show where Nathan Clay may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 14 scholars most cited alongside Nathan Clay, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 183 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 68 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 66 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 49 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 36 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 29 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 27 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 20 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 18 | |
| 10 | 2022 | 13 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 12 | |
| 12 | 2023 | 7 | |
| 13 | 2018 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2024 | 1 |
About Nathan Clay
Nathan Clay is a scholar working on General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecology and Food Science, having authored 15 papers that have together received 534 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development (8 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (5 papers), Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact (4 papers), Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability (4 papers), Climate change impacts on agriculture (4 papers), Energy and Environment Impacts (3 papers), Water Governance and Infrastructure (2 papers) and Agricultural Innovations and Practices (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (166 citations), Soil Science (60 citations), Ecology (146 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (29 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (102 citations). Nathan Clay has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Jamie Lorimer, Tara Garnett, Brian King, Karl S. Zimmerer, Alexandra Sexton, Xiaotao Jiang, Karen Charlton, Anita Stefoska‐Needham, Emma Heffernan and Jordan Stanford. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Rural Studies, Geoforum, Agriculture and Human Values, AMBIO and Annals of the American Association of Geographers.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.