Nathan Cheng

533 citations
21 papers · 340 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Nathan Cheng

18 papers receiving 336 citations

Peers

Nathan Cheng
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 123
  • Urology 66
  • Health Informatics 12
  • Surgery 159
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 57
Replace Matthew Peterson with:
Matthew Peterson United States
Andrew C. Peterson United States
Egor Parkhomenko United States
Thomas G. Clifford United States
Chi‐Shin Tseng Taiwan
Karim Rizwan Nathani United States
Jin-Ho Hwang South Korea
Osama Al‐Saeed Kuwait
Ralph C M Berendsen Netherlands
Jae-Sung Ahn South Korea
Nathan Cheng relative to Matthew Peterson United States Matthew Peterson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×9.5×
Matthew Peterson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nathan Cheng

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan Cheng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan Cheng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan Cheng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan Cheng

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan Cheng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan Cheng. The network helps show where Nathan Cheng may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nathan Cheng, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nathan Cheng Line = papers co-authored together Nathan Cheng links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201892
2 201858
3 202043
4 202031
5 202129
6 201825
7 202119
8 202016
9 202310
10 20176
11 20233
12 20242
13 20221
14 20221
15 20201
16 20211
17 20181
18 20131
19 20210
20 20230

About Nathan Cheng

Nathan Cheng is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Urology, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 21 papers that have together received 340 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ureteral procedures and complications (8 papers), Urological Disorders and Treatments (6 papers), Renal and Vascular Pathologies (4 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (3 papers), Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies (2 papers), Infectious Aortic and Vascular Conditions (2 papers), Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments (1 paper) and Infectious Disease Case Reports and Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (123 citations), Urology (66 citations), Health Informatics (12 citations), Surgery (159 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (57 citations). Nathan Cheng has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Grenada and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Andrew J. Hung, Paul J. Oh, Jian Chen, Inderbir Singh Gill, Daphne Remulla, Giovanni Enrico Cacciamani, MICHAEL D. STIFELMAN, Ziho Lee, Matthew Lee and Randall A. Lee. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Urology, Urology, Journal of Endourology, The FASEB Journal and Advances in Radiation Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact