Nathan Albin

20 papers receiving 216 citations

Peers

Nathan Albin
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Numerical Analysis 16
  • Computational Mechanics 59
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 40
  • Mathematical Physics 22
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 29
Replace Brad Baxter with:
Brad Baxter United Kingdom
Tomasz Hrycak Austria
Michel Petitot France
Giampietro Allasia Italy
Nakhlé H. Asmar United States
Giacomo Gigante Italy
Cecilia Cavaterra Italy
Jianbo Cui China
N. A. Magnitskii Russia
Swanhild Bernstein Germany
Nathan Albin relative to Brad Baxter United Kingdom Brad Baxter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13×
Brad Baxter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nathan Albin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan Albin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan Albin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan Albin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan Albin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan Albin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan Albin. The network helps show where Nathan Albin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Nathan Albin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nathan Albin Line = papers co-authored together Nathan Albin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201658
2 201143
3 201222
4 201117
5 201616
6 200714
7 201511
8 20098
9 20178
10 20075
11 20154
12 20164
13 20144
14 20213
15 20162
16 20182
17 20192
18 20101
19 20191
20 20181

About Nathan Albin

Nathan Albin is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Geometry and Topology, Mechanics of Materials, Computational Mechanics and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 24 papers that have together received 226 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering (4 papers), Complex Network Analysis Techniques (4 papers), Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics (4 papers), Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography (3 papers), Graph theory and applications (3 papers), Composite Material Mechanics (3 papers), Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics (3 papers) and Numerical methods in engineering (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Numerical Analysis (16 citations), Computational Mechanics (59 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (40 citations), Mathematical Physics (22 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (29 citations). Nathan Albin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Oscar P. Bruno, Radoslav Bortel, Punit Prakash, Pietro Poggi‐Corradini, Balasubramaniam Natarajan, Caterina Scoglio, Robin O. Cleveland, Vincenzo Nesi, Heman Shakeri and Andrej Cherkaev. Their work appears in journals such as Physical review. E, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Journal of Computational Physics, Medical Physics and Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact