Christopher Swank

563 citations
14 papers · 100 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Christopher Swank

12 papers receiving 96 citations

Peers

Christopher Swank
Comparison fields: 5 of 17
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 88
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 36
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 26
  • Spectroscopy 19
  • Radiation 9
Replace R. Stoepler with:
R. Stoepler Germany
Steven Clayton United States
T. Averett United States
G. J. Farooq-Smith Belgium
O. Kavatsyuk Netherlands
H. Schmieden Germany
J. Cederkäll Sweden
R.-B. Gerst Germany
Y. Sun China
G. Häfner Germany
Christopher Swank relative to R. Stoepler Germany R. Stoepler's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
R. Stoepler · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Swank

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Swank's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Swank with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Swank more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Swank

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Swank. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Swank. The network helps show where Christopher Swank may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Christopher Swank, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Christopher Swank Line = papers co-authored together Christopher Swank links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 201121
2 201121
3 200912
4 201212
5 20178
6 20166
7 20096
8 20185
9 20163
10 20153
11
An Investigation in the Dynamics of Polarized Helium-3 in Superfluid Helium-4 for the Spallation Neutron Source (SNS) neutron-electric-dipole-moment (nEDM) experiment
20122
12 20121
13 20240
14 20210

About Christopher Swank

Christopher Swank is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Condensed Matter Physics and Mathematical Physics, having authored 14 papers that have together received 100 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (9 papers), Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (7 papers), NMR spectroscopy and applications (4 papers), Theoretical and Computational Physics (2 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics (2 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (2 papers) and Nuclear Physics and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (88 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (36 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (26 citations), Spectroscopy (19 citations) and Radiation (9 citations). Christopher Swank has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Robert Golub, Ryan Rohm, A. K. Petukhov, Y. Zhang, H. Gao, P.R. Huffman, B. W. Filippone, E. Korobkina, Nima Nouri and R. Carr. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review A, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment, Physical review. A, Review of Scientific Instruments and Physics Letters A.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact