Natasha Rawson

509 citations
11 papers · 369 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Natasha Rawson

11 papers receiving 359 citations

Peers

Natasha Rawson
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
  • Clinical Psychology 313
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 9
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 65
  • General Health Professions 57
  • Biological Psychiatry 5
Replace Ana Vilela Mendes with:
Ana Vilela Mendes Brazil
Kelly P. Maieritsch United States
Ingebjørg Hestetun Norway
M. B. Stein United States
Hajime Tanabe Japan
Fernanda Aguiar Pizeta Brazil
Lauren St. Hill United States
Philippe Shnaider Canada
Debora van Dam Netherlands
Dorothea Kluczniok Germany
Natasha Rawson relative to Ana Vilela Mendes Brazil Ana Vilela Mendes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
Ana Vilela Mendes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Natasha Rawson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natasha Rawson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natasha Rawson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natasha Rawson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natasha Rawson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natasha Rawson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natasha Rawson. The network helps show where Natasha Rawson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Natasha Rawson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Natasha Rawson Line = papers co-authored together Natasha Rawson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2014191
2 201737
3 201835
4 202230
5 202419
6 202118
7 201718
8 20218
9 20236
10 20244
11 20253

About Natasha Rawson

Natasha Rawson is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Epidemiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 369 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (6 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (5 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (2 papers), Resilience and Mental Health (1 paper), Nerve injury and regeneration (1 paper), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (1 paper), COVID-19 and Mental Health (1 paper) and Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (313 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (9 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (65 citations), General Health Professions (57 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (5 citations). Natasha Rawson has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Richard A. Bryant, Lucy Kenny, Catherine Cahill, Amy Joscelyne, Fiona Maccallum, Angela Nickerson, Sally Hopwood, Idan M. Aderka, Katie Dawson and Benjamin D. Garber. Their work appears in journals such as JAMA Psychiatry, European journal of psychotraumatology, Psychoneuroendocrinology, The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry and The Lancet Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact