Natasha C. Wright

23 papers receiving 476 citations

Peers

Natasha C. Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Water Science and Technology 359
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology 33
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 159
  • Biomedical Engineering 317
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 40
Replace Noemí Melián-Martel with:
Noemí Melián-Martel Spain
Paz Nativ Israel
S. Ebrahim Kuwait
Bhausaheb L. Pangarkar India
Ashraf S. Hassan Qatar
Mahmoud M. Elewa Egypt
Andreas Broeckmann Australia
P. Glueckstern Israel
Khaled Touati Canada
Krzysztof Mitko Poland
Natasha C. Wright relative to Noemí Melián-Martel Spain Noemí Melián-Martel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Noemí Melián-Martel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Natasha C. Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natasha C. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natasha C. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natasha C. Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natasha C. Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natasha C. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natasha C. Wright. The network helps show where Natasha C. Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Natasha C. Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Natasha C. Wright Line = papers co-authored together Natasha C. Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201493
2 201893
3 201648
4 201847
5 202046
6 201837
7 201933
8 202015
9 201811
10 20219
11 20219
12 20198
13 20156
14 20226
15 20156
16 20245
17 20214
18 20174
19 20233
20 20233

About Natasha C. Wright

Natasha C. Wright is a scholar working on Water Science and Technology, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Biomedical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering and Pollution, having authored 26 papers that have together received 490 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Membrane Separation Technologies (16 papers), Solar-Powered Water Purification Methods (11 papers), Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques (10 papers), Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies (3 papers), Child Nutrition and Water Access (3 papers), Heat Transfer and Optimization (3 papers), Adsorption and Cooling Systems (3 papers) and Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Water Science and Technology (359 citations), Energy Engineering and Power Technology (33 citations), Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (159 citations), Biomedical Engineering (317 citations) and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (40 citations). Natasha C. Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Africa and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Amos G. Winter, Susan Amrose, Sahil Shah, Katya Cherukumilli, Ian Marius Peters, Tonio Buonassisi, Wei He, Kishor G. Nayar, Devarajan Ramanujan and William A. Arnold. Their work appears in journals such as Desalination, Environmental Science & Technology, Journal of Membrane Science, Environmental Engineering Science and Bioresource Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact