Natalie Yang

23 papers receiving 207 citations

Peers

Natalie Yang
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Health Informatics 10
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 50
  • Reproductive Medicine 48
  • Nephrology 24
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 13
Replace Marina Popović with:
Marina Popović Serbia
Erika Pace United Kingdom
Davide Campobasso Italy
Laurien Goedemans Netherlands
Doron Shmorgun Canada
Thomas Hébert France
Alfredo D’Andrea Italy
Marta Goglia Italy
Peder Gjengstø Norway
Simone Scarcella Italy
Natalie Yang relative to Marina Popović Serbia Marina Popović's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Marina Popović · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Yang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Yang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Yang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Yang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Yang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Yang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Yang. The network helps show where Natalie Yang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Natalie Yang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Natalie Yang Line = papers co-authored together Natalie Yang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201158
2 200836
3 202224
4 201514
5 202011
6 20129
7 20128
8 20077
9 20166
10 20196
11 20146
12
A comparative study of transvaginal ultrasonography and pelvic arteriogram in assessment of patients with gestational trophoblastic tumour.
19985
13 20194
14 20224
15 20214
16 20203
17 20222
18 20222
19 20211
20 20151

About Natalie Yang

Natalie Yang is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Surgery, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Reproductive Medicine, having authored 24 papers that have together received 214 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (5 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (5 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (4 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (3 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (2 papers), Radiology practices and education (2 papers), Ultrasound in Clinical Applications (2 papers) and Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (10 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (50 citations), Reproductive Medicine (48 citations), Nephrology (24 citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (13 citations). Natalie Yang has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Canada and Thailand. Frequent co-authors include Derek Muradali, Rinaldo Bellomo, Clive N. May, Li Wan, Anthony Schelleman, Lynne Johnson, Lenore Ellett, Peter Maher, Glen Lo and S. Reid. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Radiology, Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, American Journal of Roentgenology, Critical Care and Resuscitation and IEEE Access.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact