Natalie Yang

23 papers receiving 218 citations

Peers

Natalie Yang
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Health Informatics 9
  • Reproductive Medicine 47
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 37
  • Nephrology 20
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 13
Replace Marina Popović with:
Marina Popović Serbia
Erika Pace United Kingdom
Thomas Hébert France
Cengiz Erol Türkiye
F. Malpassini Italy
Laurien Goedemans Netherlands
Abdelrahman Abdelaal Qatar
Alfredo D’Andrea Italy
Yukio Nakabayashi Japan
Jung Keun Lee South Korea
Natalie Yang relative to Marina Popović Serbia Marina Popović's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.8×
Marina Popović · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Yang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Yang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Yang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Yang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Yang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Yang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Yang. The network helps show where Natalie Yang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Natalie Yang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Natalie Yang Line = papers co-authored together Natalie Yang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201160
2 200837
3 202227
4 201514
5 202011
6 20129
7 20128
8 20078
9 20146
10 20166
11 20196
12
A comparative study of transvaginal ultrasonography and pelvic arteriogram in assessment of patients with gestational trophoblastic tumour.
19985
13 20224
14 20224
15 20194
16 20204
17 20214
18 20222
19 20241
20 20241

About Natalie Yang

Natalie Yang is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Reproductive Medicine, Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 24 papers that have together received 224 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Endometriosis Research and Treatment (4 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (2 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (2 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (1 paper), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (1 paper), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (1 paper), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (1 paper) and Radiology practices and education (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (9 citations), Reproductive Medicine (47 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (37 citations), Nephrology (20 citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (13 citations). Natalie Yang has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Derek Muradali, Rinaldo Bellomo, Clive N. May, Lynne Johnson, Li Wan, Anthony Schelleman, Glen Lo, S. Reid, Peter Maher and Lenore Ellett. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Radiology, Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, Critical Care and Resuscitation, American Journal of Roentgenology and Intensive Care Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact