Thomas Hébert

486 citations
39 papers · 346 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Hébert

37 papers receiving 330 citations

Peers

Thomas Hébert
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 109
  • Reproductive Medicine 110
  • Surgery 94
  • Hepatology 14
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 35
Replace Natalie Yang with:
Natalie Yang Australia
Jinhui Wang China
Edward Haeusler Italy
Sachit K. Verma United States
Shabber S. Zaveri India
Cengiz Erol Türkiye
André Lopes Brazil
Paola Pollastri Italy
Tufan Öge Türkiye
Claudio Lodoli Italy
Thomas Hébert relative to Natalie Yang Australia Natalie Yang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.7×
Natalie Yang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Hébert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Hébert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Hébert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Hébert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Hébert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Hébert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Hébert. The network helps show where Thomas Hébert may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Hébert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Hébert Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Hébert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201354
2 201450
3 201928
4 202028
5 201820
6 202117
7 200916
8 200713
9 201511
10 20159
11 20048
12 20098
13 20208
14 20208
15 20097
16 20226
17 20125
18 20145
19 20234
20 20144

About Thomas Hébert

Thomas Hébert is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Hepatology, having authored 39 papers that have together received 346 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Endometriosis Research and Treatment (8 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (3 papers), Aortic aneurysm repair treatments (2 papers), Vascular anomalies and interventions (2 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (2 papers), Gynecological conditions and treatments (2 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (2 papers) and Liver Disease and Transplantation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (109 citations), Reproductive Medicine (110 citations), Surgery (94 citations), Hepatology (14 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (35 citations). Thomas Hébert has collaborated with scholars based in France, Belgium and Italy. Frequent co-authors include G. Body, Pierre Collinet, Christophe Gaborit, Pierre Lèguevaque, Henri Marret, Rosa Maria Neme, Hirotaka Nishi, Vito Cela, Peter Barton‐Smith and Michelle Nisolle. Their work appears in journals such as Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Anesthesiology, Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, Annals of Surgical Oncology and Surgical Endoscopy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact