Thomas Hébert

465 citations
33 papers · 297 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Hébert

32 papers receiving 287 citations

Peers

Thomas Hébert
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 101
  • Reproductive Medicine 107
  • Surgery 71
  • Cancer Research 14
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 28
Replace Jinhui Wang with:
Jinhui Wang China
Varol Gülseren Türkiye
T. Caramella France
Natalia R. Gómez‐Hidalgo Spain
P. Pollastri Italy
Natalie Yang Australia
Dimitrij Kuhelj Slovenia
José Luís Sánchez-Iglesias Spain
M. Gualtieri United States
Bernd Bojahr Germany
Thomas Hébert relative to Jinhui Wang China Jinhui Wang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Jinhui Wang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Hébert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Hébert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Hébert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Hébert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Hébert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Hébert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Hébert. The network helps show where Thomas Hébert may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Hébert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Hébert Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Hébert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201352
2 201449
3 201926
4 202024
5 201820
6 200915
7 202114
8 200712
9 201510
10 20158
11 20207
12 20047
13 20226
14 20095
15 20145
16 20054
17 20203
18 20233
19 20143
20 20063

About Thomas Hébert

Thomas Hébert is a scholar working on Surgery, Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 33 papers that have together received 297 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Endometriosis Research and Treatment (8 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (3 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (2 papers), Nausea and vomiting management (2 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (2 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (2 papers), Gynecological conditions and treatments (2 papers) and Aortic aneurysm repair treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (101 citations), Reproductive Medicine (107 citations), Surgery (71 citations), Cancer Research (14 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (28 citations). Thomas Hébert has collaborated with scholars based in France, Belgium and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include G. Body, Pierre Collinet, Christophe Gaborit, H. Marret, Pierre Lèguevaque, Rosa Maria Neme, Michelle Nisolle, Vito Cela, Peter Barton‐Smith and Hirotaka Nishi. Their work appears in journals such as Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, Annals of Surgical Oncology, Anesthesiology and Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact