Natalie Watson
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 10%
- Digital Mental Health Interventions
-
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Papers in
-
- Mental Health and Patient Involvement 1
- Health Policy Implementation Science 1
- Mobile Health and mHealth Applications 1
-
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development 1
- Co-authors
- Janet Currie (1 shared paper)Margaret Thomas (1 shared paper)Andrew Milat (1 shared paper)Joshua Fogel (2 shared papers)Monika Marko (2 shared papers)Benjamin W. Van Voorhees (2 shared papers)Nicholas Reid (1 shared paper)S Zuckerman (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Health Promotion Journal of Australia (1 paper)Progress in community health partnerships (1 paper)Learning Health Systems (1 paper)The Primary Care Companion to The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (1 paper)PubMed (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Natalie Watson
5 papers receiving 121 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
- Applied Psychology 45
- Clinical Psychology 39
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 9
- General Health Professions 23
- Speech and Hearing 6
Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Watson
This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Watson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Watson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Watson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Watson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Watson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Watson. The network helps show where Natalie Watson may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 23 scholars most cited alongside Natalie Watson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Adolescent Dose and Ratings of an Internet-Based Depression Prevention Program: A Randomized Trial of Primary Care Physician Brief Advice versus a Motivational Interview. | 2009 | 56 |
| 2 | 2005 | 35 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 20 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 9 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 7 |
About Natalie Watson
Natalie Watson is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Applied Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Infectious Diseases, having authored 5 papers that have together received 127 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health and Patient Involvement (1 paper), Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper), Digital Mental Health Interventions (1 paper), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (1 paper), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (1 paper) and Healthcare Systems and Technology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (45 citations), Clinical Psychology (39 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (9 citations), General Health Professions (23 citations) and Speech and Hearing (6 citations). Natalie Watson has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Janet Currie, Margaret Thomas, Andrew Milat, Joshua Fogel, Monika Marko, Benjamin W. Van Voorhees, Nicholas Reid, S Zuckerman, Nathan Bradford and Rocco Domanico. Their work appears in journals such as Health Promotion Journal of Australia, Progress in community health partnerships, Learning Health Systems, The Primary Care Companion to The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry and PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.