Natalie Ram

23 papers receiving 239 citations

Peers

Natalie Ram
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Reproductive Medicine 33
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 88
  • Health Informatics 4
  • Genetics 72
  • Modeling and Simulation 7
Replace Benjamin Capps with:
Benjamin Capps Singapore
Emilia Niemiec Sweden
Alice K. Hawkins Canada
Catherine Gliwa United States
Andrea Boggio United States
Margaret Waltz United States
Rosalina D. James United States
Lynae M. Brayboy United States
Clair Kronk United States
Kavita Shah United States
Natalie Ram relative to Benjamin Capps Singapore Benjamin Capps's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Benjamin Capps · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Ram

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Ram's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Ram with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Ram more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Ram

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Ram. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Ram. The network helps show where Natalie Ram may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Natalie Ram, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Natalie Ram Line = papers co-authored together Natalie Ram links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201866
2 202033
3 202031
4 200325
5 201623
6 202120
7
TIERED CONSENT AND THE TYRANNY OF CHOICE
200718
8 20068
9 20058
10 20166
11 20225
12
Britain permits controversial genetic test.
20053
13
Innovating Criminal Justice
20173
14 20243
15 20233
16 20222
17 20062
18 19722
19
One Shot Learning In AI Innovation
20192
20
Assigning Rights And Protecting Interests: Constructing Ethical And Efficient Legal Rights In Human Tissue Research
20091

About Natalie Ram

Natalie Ram is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Political Science and International Relations, Reproductive Medicine, Artificial Intelligence and Physiology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 268 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in Clinical Research (6 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (6 papers), Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (5 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (4 papers), Law, AI, and Intellectual Property (4 papers), Forensic and Genetic Research (2 papers), SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing (2 papers) and Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (33 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (88 citations), Health Informatics (4 citations), Genetics (72 citations) and Modeling and Simulation (7 citations). Natalie Ram has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Amy L. McGuire, Christi J. Guerrini, David Gray, Jeffrey L. Ram, Lance Gable, Françoise Βaylis, Sonia M. Suter, Erin E. Murphy, Brenda L. Beagan and Josephine Johnston. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Journal of Law and the Biosciences, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, Northwestern University law review and Harvard Law Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact