Natalie Malone

40 papers receiving 243 citations

Peers

Natalie Malone
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
  • Gender Studies 81
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 66
  • Clinical Psychology 92
  • General Health Professions 75
  • Social Psychology 55
Replace Jardin N. Dogan with:
Jardin N. Dogan United States
Silja Matthiesen Germany
Heather Blunt-Vinti United States
Nikola Komlenac Austria
Josep Fabà Spain
Joanna Hogg United Kingdom
Natalie Amos Australia
Nick McRee United States
Carlos Chiclana Actis Spain
Abdul Wahab Yousafzai Pakistan
Natalie Malone relative to Jardin N. Dogan United States Jardin N. Dogan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Jardin N. Dogan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Malone

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Malone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Malone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Malone more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Malone

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Malone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Malone. The network helps show where Natalie Malone may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Natalie Malone, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Natalie Malone Line = papers co-authored together Natalie Malone links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202032
2 202221
3 202217
4 202115
5 202213
6 201813
7 202112
8 202212
9 202110
10 20219
11 20217
12 20227
13 20237
14 20227
15 20236
16 20225
17 20235
18 20244
19 20244
20 19754

About Natalie Malone

Natalie Malone is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Gender Studies, Psychiatry and Mental health and Social Psychology, having authored 46 papers that have together received 248 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (12 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (10 papers), Sexual function and dysfunction studies (10 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (10 papers), LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (8 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (7 papers), Marriage and Sexual Relationships (3 papers) and Sex work and related issues (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (81 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (66 citations), Clinical Psychology (92 citations), General Health Professions (75 citations) and Social Psychology (55 citations). Natalie Malone has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Candice N. Hargons, Jardin N. Dogan, Shemeka Thorpe, Danelle Stevens‐Watkins, Praise Iyiewuare, Della V. Mosley, Samuella Ware, Kenneth M. Tyler, Milton J. Kornet and Anneliese A. Singh. Their work appears in journals such as Culture Health & Sexuality, Journal of Black Psychology, The Journal of Sex Research, Psychology of Men & Masculinity and Body Image.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact