Natalie Gray

23 papers receiving 432 citations

Peers

Natalie Gray
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • General Health Professions 172
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 76
  • Gender Studies 39
  • Animal Science and Zoology 34
  • Health 20
Replace Relana Pinkerton with:
Relana Pinkerton United States
Ann S. Botash United States
Spring Chenoa Cooper Robbins Australia
Sarah R. Sullivan United States
Douglas Huber United States
Michelle O’Brien Ireland
S. Kenneth Schonberg United States
Amanda Bertram United States
Daniel C. Ehlman United States
Natalie Gray relative to Relana Pinkerton United States Relana Pinkerton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.5×
Relana Pinkerton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Gray

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Gray's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Gray with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Gray more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Gray

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Gray. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Gray. The network helps show where Natalie Gray may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Natalie Gray, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Natalie Gray Line = papers co-authored together Natalie Gray links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013115
2 201172
3 201466
4 196538
5 200936
6 201127
7 201122
8 199620
9 201218
10 200611
11 20099
12 20137
13 20215
14 20135
15 20244
16 20084
17
A patient dose survey for three common diagnostic radiographic examinations using a dose-area product meter.
19944
18 20233
19 19963
20
Framework for Research on Aboriginal Health and the Physical Environment
20073

About Natalie Gray

Natalie Gray is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Health, Neurology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 24 papers that have together received 477 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (4 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (3 papers), Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (2 papers), Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights (2 papers), Radiation Dose and Imaging (2 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (2 papers), Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (2 papers) and Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (172 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (76 citations), Gender Studies (39 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (34 citations) and Health (20 citations). Natalie Gray has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Vanuatu. Frequent co-authors include Elissa Kennedy, Jennifer Harris, David Humphreys, Peter Azzopardi, Aaron E. Wasserman, Michael Vloeberghs, Richard E. Morton, Sabine Pircher, Steven Guthridge and Ross Bailie. Their work appears in journals such as The Medical Journal of Australia, European Journal of Paediatric Neurology, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, BMC Neuroscience and Nutrients.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact