Natalie E. Farrawell
Impact in
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Justin J. Yerbury (19 shared papers)Luke McAlary (11 shared papers)Darren N. Saunders (7 shared papers)Ian P. Blair (4 shared papers)Sadaf T. Warraich (2 shared papers)Danny M. Hatters (2 shared papers)Kara L. Vine (4 shared papers)Jeremy Stephen Lum (6 shared papers)
- Journals
- Scientific Reports (4 papers)Nature Communications (2 papers)ACS Chemical Neuroscience (2 papers)PLoS ONE (2 papers)Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
Natalie E. Farrawell
21 papers receiving 724 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Neurology 472
- Genetics 224
- Neurology 93
- Molecular Biology 326
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 82
Countries citing papers authored by Natalie E. Farrawell
This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie E. Farrawell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie E. Farrawell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie E. Farrawell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie E. Farrawell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie E. Farrawell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie E. Farrawell. The network helps show where Natalie E. Farrawell may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Natalie E. Farrawell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 181 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 110 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 52 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 46 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 43 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 43 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 35 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 34 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 29 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 24 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 23 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 19 | |
| 13 | 2022 | 18 | |
| 14 | 2021 | 18 | |
| 15 | 2015 | 16 | |
| 16 | 2022 | 12 | |
| 17 | 2021 | 10 | |
| 18 | 2023 | 7 | |
| 19 | 2022 | 2 | |
| 20 | 2025 | 2 |
About Natalie E. Farrawell
Natalie E. Farrawell is a scholar working on Neurology, Genetics, Biomaterials, Neurology and Epidemiology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 725 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research (17 papers), Neurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research (10 papers), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (5 papers), Autophagy in Disease and Therapy (4 papers), biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties (3 papers), Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (2 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (2 papers) and Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (472 citations), Genetics (224 citations), Neurology (93 citations), Molecular Biology (326 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (82 citations). Natalie E. Farrawell has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Justin J. Yerbury, Luke McAlary, Darren N. Saunders, Ian P. Blair, Sadaf T. Warraich, Danny M. Hatters, Kara L. Vine, Jeremy Stephen Lum, Mark R. Wilson and Rafaa Zeineddine. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Nature Communications, ACS Chemical Neuroscience, PLoS ONE and Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.