Natalibeth Barrera
Impact in
- Reproductive Medicine top 5%
- Sperm and Testicular Function
- Ovarian function and disorders
- Reproductive Health and Technologies
- Aging top 10%
Papers in
-
- Sperm and Testicular Function 7
- Reproductive Health and Technologies 4
- Ovarian function and disorders 4
-
- Reproductive Biology and Fertility 9
- Co-authors
- Martina Crispo (10 shared papers)Alejo Menchaca (10 shared papers)F. Cuadro (10 shared papers)P. C. dos Santos-Neto (6 shared papers)Ana Paula Mulet (3 shared papers)I. Anegón (2 shared papers)Tràng Hiếu Nguyen (2 shared papers)Lucas Brusselle (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Cryobiology (3 papers)Animal Reproduction Science (2 papers)PLoS ONE (2 papers)Theriogenology (1 paper)Andrologia (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- UruguaySouth AfricaFrance
In The Last Decade
Natalibeth Barrera
14 papers receiving 510 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
- Reproductive Medicine 173
- Aging 24
- Business and International Management 26
- Genetics 198
- Agronomy and Crop Science 68
Countries citing papers authored by Natalibeth Barrera
This map shows the geographic impact of Natalibeth Barrera's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalibeth Barrera with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalibeth Barrera more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Natalibeth Barrera
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalibeth Barrera. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalibeth Barrera. The network helps show where Natalibeth Barrera may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 19 scholars most cited alongside Natalibeth Barrera, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 220 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 99 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 31 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 28 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 28 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 24 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 22 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 17 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 17 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 16 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 15 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 7 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2018 | 1 |
About Natalibeth Barrera
Natalibeth Barrera is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Agronomy and Crop Science, Molecular Biology and Genetics, having authored 14 papers that have together received 528 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Biology and Fertility (9 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (7 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (4 papers), Ovarian function and disorders (4 papers), Animal Genetics and Reproduction (3 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (3 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (2 papers) and Seed Germination and Physiology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (173 citations), Aging (24 citations), Business and International Management (26 citations), Genetics (198 citations) and Agronomy and Crop Science (68 citations). Natalibeth Barrera has collaborated with scholars based in Uruguay, South Africa and France. Frequent co-authors include Martina Crispo, Alejo Menchaca, F. Cuadro, P. C. dos Santos-Neto, Ana Paula Mulet, I. Anegón, Tràng Hiếu Nguyen, Lucas Brusselle, Marzo Edir Da Silva‐Grigoletto and D. Vaamonde. Their work appears in journals such as Cryobiology, Animal Reproduction Science, PLoS ONE, Theriogenology and Andrologia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.