Natalia Roberto

6 papers receiving 187 citations

Peers

Natalia Roberto
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
  • Clinical Psychology 142
  • Biological Psychiatry 14
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 57
  • Organic Chemistry 52
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 26
Replace Federico Cavanna with:
Federico Cavanna Argentina
Yasmin Padovan‐Hernandez United States
Sophia Armand Denmark
Heloisa Onias Brazil
Helena Aicher Switzerland
Drummond E-Wen McCulloch Denmark
Young Jun Song South Korea
Mitchell B. Liester United States
Patricia Duerler Switzerland
Lê-Anh Dinh-Williams Canada
Natalia Roberto relative to Federico Cavanna Argentina Federico Cavanna's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Federico Cavanna · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Natalia Roberto

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalia Roberto's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalia Roberto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalia Roberto more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalia Roberto

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalia Roberto. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalia Roberto. The network helps show where Natalia Roberto may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Natalia Roberto, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Natalia Roberto Line = papers co-authored together Natalia Roberto links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 2017140
2 202321
3 201812
4 201911
5 20243
6 20242
7 20250
8 20240

About Natalia Roberto

Natalia Roberto is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Control and Systems Engineering, Urban Studies, Social Psychology and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 8 papers that have together received 189 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (3 papers), Robotics and Automated Systems (2 papers), AI in Service Interactions (1 paper), Regional resilience and development (1 paper), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (1 paper), Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems (1 paper), Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence (1 paper) and Urban Planning and Valuation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (142 citations), Biological Psychiatry (14 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (57 citations), Organic Chemistry (52 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (26 citations). Natalia Roberto has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Italy and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Elisabet Domínguez‐Clavé, Jaime E. C. Hallak, Mario de la Fuente Revenga, Luís Eduardo Luna, Marta Valle, José Alexandre S. Crippa, Jordi Riba, Enric Álvarez, Amanda Feilding and Juan Carlos Pascual. Their work appears in journals such as European Psychiatry, The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology, Psychological Medicine, Psicothema and City Territory and Architecture.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact