Natacha Lorius

1.4k citations
16 papers · 925 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Natacha Lorius

16 papers receiving 911 citations

Peers

Natacha Lorius
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 628
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 197
  • Physiology 191
  • Neurology 56
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 10
Replace Ilona Hallikainen with:
Ilona Hallikainen Finland
Jong Choul Youn South Korea
Cristina Lojo‐Seoane Spain
Simona Sacuiu Sweden
H. Beaumont United Kingdom
Linda M.P. Wesselman Netherlands
Felipe Kenji Sudo Brazil
Christopher Gidicsin United States
Ben Schmand Netherlands
Chih‐Ta Tai Taiwan
Natacha Lorius relative to Ilona Hallikainen Finland Ilona Hallikainen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
Ilona Hallikainen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Natacha Lorius

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natacha Lorius's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natacha Lorius with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natacha Lorius more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natacha Lorius

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natacha Lorius. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natacha Lorius. The network helps show where Natacha Lorius may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Natacha Lorius, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Natacha Lorius Line = papers co-authored together Natacha Lorius links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2012362
2 2012110
3 201383
4 201564
5 201360
6 201258
7 201451
8 201449
9 201445
10 201435
11 20123
12 20111
13 20131
14 20121
15 20131
16 20111

About Natacha Lorius

Natacha Lorius is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Neurology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Physiology and Rehabilitation, having authored 16 papers that have together received 925 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (16 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (3 papers), Neurological Disorders and Treatments (3 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (2 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (2 papers), Folate and B Vitamins Research (1 paper), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (1 paper) and GDF15 and Related Biomarkers (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (628 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (197 citations), Physiology (191 citations), Neurology (56 citations) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (10 citations). Natacha Lorius has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Dorene M. Rentz, Reisa A. Sperling, Keith A. Johnson, Lauren P. Wadsworth, Gad A. Marshall, Rebecca E. Amariglio, Joseph J. Locascio, Lesley Pepin, J. Alex Becker and Jacqueline Maye. Their work appears in journals such as Alzheimer s & Dementia, Journal of Neuropsychiatry, Journal of Alzheimer s Disease, Current Alzheimer Research and Neuropsychologia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact