Natacha Lorius
Impact in
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 2%
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Physiology top 10%
- Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Papers in
-
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research 16
-
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments 1
- Co-authors
- Dorene M. Rentz (16 shared papers)Reisa Anne Sperling (16 shared papers)Keith A. Johnson (15 shared papers)Lauren Page Wadsworth (7 shared papers)Gad A. Marshall (13 shared papers)Rebecca England Amariglio (7 shared papers)Joseph J. Locascio (10 shared papers)John Alex Becker (5 shared papers)
- Journals
- Alzheimer s & Dementia (6 papers)Journal of Alzheimer s Disease (2 papers)Journal of Neuropsychiatry (2 papers)Neurology (1 paper)Current Alzheimer Research (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Natacha Lorius
18 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Natacha Lorius's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Psychiatry and Mental health 927
- Physiology 143
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 9
- Ophthalmology 30
- Cognitive Neuroscience 63
Countries citing papers authored by Natacha Lorius
This map shows the geographic impact of Natacha Lorius's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natacha Lorius with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natacha Lorius more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Natacha Lorius
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natacha Lorius. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natacha Lorius. The network helps show where Natacha Lorius may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Natacha Lorius, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Subjective cognitive complaints and amyloid burden in cognitively normal older individuals Hit paper breakdown → | 2012 | 402 |
| 2 | 2015 | 136 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 118 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 90 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 74 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 64 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 63 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 57 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 51 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 48 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 35 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 33 | |
| 13 | 2012 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2011 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2011 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2012 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2013 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2013 | 1 |
About Natacha Lorius
Natacha Lorius is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Ophthalmology, Physiology, Nuclear Energy and Engineering and Waste Management and Disposal, having authored 18 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (16 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (1 paper) and Retinal Diseases and Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (927 citations), Physiology (143 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (9 citations), Ophthalmology (30 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (63 citations). Natacha Lorius has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Dorene M. Rentz, Reisa Anne Sperling, Keith A. Johnson, Lauren Page Wadsworth, Gad A. Marshall, Rebecca England Amariglio, Joseph J. Locascio, John Alex Becker, Lesley Catherine Pepin and Jacqueline E. Maye. Their work appears in journals such as Alzheimer s & Dementia, Journal of Alzheimer s Disease, Journal of Neuropsychiatry, Neurology and Current Alzheimer Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.