Nancy Vera

29 papers receiving 315 citations

Peers

Nancy Vera
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Insect Science 173
  • Food Science 132
  • Horticulture 6
  • Biochemistry 23
  • Plant Science 123
Replace Maria da Paz Lima with:
Maria da Paz Lima Brazil
María Belén Agüero Argentina
Ricardo Marques Montanari Brazil
María Teresa Tinoco Portugal
Luciane Corbellini Rufatto Brazil
Ivana Maria Póvoa Violante Brazil
Ricardo Guimarães Amaral Brazil
Telma S. M. Grandi Brazil
O. P. Sidhu India
K. R. L. Freire Brazil
Nancy Vera relative to Maria da Paz Lima Brazil Maria da Paz Lima's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Maria da Paz Lima · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nancy Vera

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nancy Vera's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nancy Vera with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nancy Vera more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nancy Vera

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nancy Vera. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nancy Vera. The network helps show where Nancy Vera may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nancy Vera, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nancy Vera Line = papers co-authored together Nancy Vera links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201140
2 200937
3 201226
4 201823
5 200822
6 201622
7 200621
8 201819
9 201818
10 202015
11 201214
12 201611
13 20209
14 20188
15 20178
16 20236
17 20224
18 20194
19 20213
20 20243

About Nancy Vera

Nancy Vera is a scholar working on Food Science, Insect Science, Plant Science, Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, having authored 29 papers that have together received 329 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (13 papers), Bee Products Chemical Analysis (9 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (6 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (6 papers), Insect Pest Control Strategies (5 papers), Sesquiterpenes and Asteraceae Studies (3 papers), Psidium guajava Extracts and Applications (3 papers) and Plant Toxicity and Pharmacological Properties (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (173 citations), Food Science (132 citations), Horticulture (6 citations), Biochemistry (23 citations) and Plant Science (123 citations). Nancy Vera has collaborated with scholars based in Argentina, Bolivia and Ecuador. Frequent co-authors include Alicia Bardón, Luis Maldonado, Marı́a Inés Isla, Roxana M. Ordóñez, Enrique Bedascarrasbure, Susana Borkosky, Manuel González Sierra, Soledad Cuello, Yoshinori Asakawa and Rosana I. Misico. Their work appears in journals such as Natural Product Communications, Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications and Phytochemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact