Nancy Seear

503 citations
14 papers · 361 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Nancy Seear

13 papers receiving 233 citations

Peers

Nancy Seear
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Public Administration 97
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 73
  • General Psychology 7
  • Political Science and International Relations 80
  • Management Science and Operations Research 39
Replace Jane Slaughter with:
Jane Slaughter United States
Sue Fernie United Kingdom
Richard Dobbins United Kingdom
Bogdan Kavčić Slovenia
Thomas H. Patten United States
F. Ted Hebert United States
Daniel H. Saks United States
Richard O. Carlson
Bridget Pym United Kingdom
Eugen Pusić Croatia
Nancy Seear relative to Jane Slaughter United States Jane Slaughter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.5×
Jane Slaughter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nancy Seear

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nancy Seear's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nancy Seear with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nancy Seear more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nancy Seear

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nancy Seear. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nancy Seear. The network helps show where Nancy Seear may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Nancy Seear, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nancy Seear Line = papers co-authored together Nancy Seear links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 1959144
2 1955138
3 195615
4 196315
5 196214
6
The Economic Position of Women in the United Kingdom
197610
7 19586
8
A career for women in industry
19645
9 19594
10 19574
11 19573
12
Two studies in industrial relations
19681
13 20231
14 20231

About Nancy Seear

Nancy Seear is a scholar working on Public Administration, Finance, Gender Studies, Education and Strategy and Management, having authored 14 papers that have together received 361 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (1 paper), Political and Economic history of UK and US (1 paper), Higher Education and Employability (1 paper), Counseling Practices and Supervision (1 paper), Labor Movements and Unions (1 paper), Social Policy and Reform Studies (1 paper), Reflective Practices in Education (1 paper) and Digital Platforms and Economics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (97 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (73 citations), General Psychology (7 citations), Political Science and International Relations (80 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (39 citations). Frequent co-authors include A. K. Rice, Hugh Armstrong Clegg, Allan D. Flanders, John H. Smith, Fritz J. Roethlisberger, Ching‐Chi Chi and Robert B. McKersie. Their work appears in journals such as Economica, British Journal of Sociology, American Economic Review, Medical Entomology and Zoology and Population.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact