Nancy N. Chen

12 papers receiving 164 citations

Peers

Nancy N. Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 44
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 11
  • Geography, Planning and Development 12
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 17
  • Pharmacy 9
Replace Paul A. Pickering with:
Paul A. Pickering Australia
Gayle Davis United Kingdom
Margaret Pelling United Kingdom
Karen R. Lawrence Australia
Jamie D. Weinand United States
Benjamin Hope United Kingdom
George D. Sussman United States
Majella McFadden United Kingdom
Dan Malleck Canada
Carol Symes United States
Nancy N. Chen relative to Paul A. Pickering Australia Paul A. Pickering's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Paul A. Pickering · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nancy N. Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nancy N. Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nancy N. Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nancy N. Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nancy N. Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nancy N. Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nancy N. Chen. The network helps show where Nancy N. Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Nancy N. Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nancy N. Chen Line = papers co-authored together Nancy N. Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 199258
2 201548
3
Bioinsecurity and Vulnerability
201422
4 199716
5 200814
6 199710
7 20238
8 20226
9 20205
10 20134
11 20062
12 19991
13 20180

About Nancy N. Chen

Nancy N. Chen is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Epidemiology, Molecular Biology and Urban Studies, having authored 13 papers that have together received 194 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breastfeeding Practices and Influences (2 papers), Vitamin D Research Studies (2 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (1 paper), Chinese history and philosophy (1 paper), Philippine History and Culture (1 paper), Health Sciences Research and Education (1 paper), Culinary Culture and Tourism (1 paper) and Bacillus and Francisella bacterial research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (44 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (11 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (12 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (17 citations) and Pharmacy (9 citations). Nancy N. Chen has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Tim Green, Hope A. Weiler, Peter von Dadelszen, Sheila M. Innis, Michael R. Lyon, Antonia Shand, Susan J. Whiting, Crystal D Karakochuk, Susan I. Barr and Kristine A. Madsen. Their work appears in journals such as American Ethnologist, Memory Studies, Visual Anthropology Review, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition and American Anthropologist.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact