Nancy Blace
Impact in
-
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Neural dynamics and brain function
Papers in
-
- Retinal Development and Disorders 3
- Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling 2
- Ion channel regulation and function 1
- Melanoma and MAPK Pathways 1
-
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research 2
- Co-authors
- Todd Charlton Sacktor (4 shared papers)Peter A. Serrano (3 shared papers)John F. Crary (2 shared papers)Larry S. Benardo (1 shared paper)Douglas S.F. Ling (1 shared paper)Matthew T. Kelly (1 shared paper)Michael Leitges (1 shared paper)Jenny Libien (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Nature Neuroscience (2 papers)Optometry and Vision Science (1 paper)Neurology (1 paper)Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (1 paper)Journal of Biological Chemistry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Nancy Blace
7 papers receiving 829 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 646
- Cognitive Neuroscience 277
- Developmental Neuroscience 50
- Neurology 67
- Behavioral Neuroscience 22
Countries citing papers authored by Nancy Blace
This map shows the geographic impact of Nancy Blace's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nancy Blace with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nancy Blace more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nancy Blace
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nancy Blace. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nancy Blace. The network helps show where Nancy Blace may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nancy Blace, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2002 | 349 | |
| 2 | 2003 | 229 | |
| 3 | 2002 | 143 | |
| 4 | 2000 | 115 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 6 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 3 | |
| 8 | Diagnostic Yield of Laboratory Testing and Imaging Studies in Patients with Optic Atrophy in an Inner City Population | 2018 | 0 |
| 9 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 10 | 2023 | 0 |
About Nancy Blace
Nancy Blace is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Surgery, Ophthalmology and Otorhinolaryngology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 852 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Development and Disorders (3 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (2 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (1 paper), Sinusitis and nasal conditions (1 paper), Retinal and Optic Conditions (1 paper), Ion channel regulation and function (1 paper) and Melanoma and MAPK Pathways (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (646 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (277 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (50 citations), Neurology (67 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (22 citations). Nancy Blace has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Todd Charlton Sacktor, Peter A. Serrano, John F. Crary, Larry S. Benardo, Douglas S.F. Ling, Matthew T. Kelly, Michael Leitges, Jenny Libien, A. Iván Hernández and Jerry C.P. Yin. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Neuroscience, Optometry and Vision Science, Neurology, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science and Journal of Biological Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.