Nancy Amodei

35 papers receiving 498 citations

Peers

Nancy Amodei
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Applied Psychology 36
  • Physiology 102
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 105
  • Clinical Psychology 80
  • General Health Professions 82
Replace Linda Langford with:
Linda Langford United States
V. Guagliardo France
Leigh Gemmell United States
Christof Meigen Germany
Holger Schmid Switzerland
Anthony J. Meyer United States
Deidre Pereira United States
Elena L. Navas-Nacher United States
Sonia Chaabane Qatar
Bernadette Davantes Heckman United States
Nancy Amodei relative to Linda Langford United States Linda Langford's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Linda Langford · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nancy Amodei

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nancy Amodei's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nancy Amodei with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nancy Amodei more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nancy Amodei

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nancy Amodei. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nancy Amodei. The network helps show where Nancy Amodei may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nancy Amodei, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nancy Amodei Line = papers co-authored together Nancy Amodei links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201370
2 200470
3 198957
4 199755
5 199622
6 199620
7 200220
8 199818
9 201516
10 198716
11 201515
12 200815
13 200515
14 200214
15 201313
16 199411
17 201711
18 200310
19 200510
20
Alcoholism prevalence and utilization of medical services by Mexican Americans.
19927

About Nancy Amodei

Nancy Amodei is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Clinical Psychology, Epidemiology and Applied Psychology, having authored 37 papers that have together received 538 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (8 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (5 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (5 papers), Menstrual Health and Disorders (3 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (3 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (3 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (3 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (36 citations), Physiology (102 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (105 citations), Clinical Psychology (80 citations) and General Health Professions (82 citations). Nancy Amodei has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Venezuela and Russia. Frequent co-authors include R. J. Lamb, Rosemery O. Nelson‐Gray, J. Paul Seale, Sandra K. Burge, Patricia A. Lane, Anthony A. Scott, Janet F. Williams, Raymond F. Palmer, A. Syme and Andrea M. Kriska. Their work appears in journals such as Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, Addiction, Health Promotion Practice, International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction and Journal of Addictive Diseases.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact