Nana Ping

570 citations
32 papers · 354 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Nana Ping

26 papers receiving 351 citations

Peers

Nana Ping
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Hematology 63
  • Oncology 125
  • Biochemistry 25
  • Sensory Systems 16
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 37
Replace Stergios Katsiougiannis with:
Stergios Katsiougiannis Greece
Manuel O. Jakob Switzerland
Chie Yasuda Japan
Mona Hedayat Iran
G Chiappino Italy
Alessia Poggi Italy
Ashraf El‐Meanawy United States
Yanling Ren China
Yune-Jung Park South Korea
Zhenqun Zhao China
Nana Ping relative to Stergios Katsiougiannis Greece Stergios Katsiougiannis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Stergios Katsiougiannis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nana Ping

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nana Ping's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nana Ping with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nana Ping more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nana Ping

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nana Ping. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nana Ping. The network helps show where Nana Ping may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nana Ping, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nana Ping Line = papers co-authored together Nana Ping links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201971
2 201434
3 201631
4 202225
5 201625
6 201523
7 201522
8 202019
9 201616
10 202215
11 201314
12 20148
13
[Expression of SET-NUP214 fusion gene in patients with T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia and its clinical significance].
20127
14 20236
15 20215
16 20165
17 20185
18 20165
19 20154
20 20243

About Nana Ping

Nana Ping is a scholar working on Oncology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Molecular Biology, Hematology and Nutrition and Dietetics, having authored 32 papers that have together received 354 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (8 papers), CAR-T cell therapy research (6 papers), Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research (5 papers), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (4 papers), Viral-associated cancers and disorders (3 papers), Sulfur Compounds in Biology (3 papers), Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research (3 papers) and Vitamin K Research Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Hematology (63 citations), Oncology (125 citations), Biochemistry (25 citations), Sensory Systems (16 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (37 citations). Nana Ping has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Pakistan. Frequent co-authors include Yong‐Xiao Cao, Lei Cao, Zhengming Jin, Changju Qu, Liqing Kang, Xue Xiao, Qian Wu, Lei Yu, Yanbing Zhu and Sen Li. Their work appears in journals such as Blood, Frontiers in Immunology, HemaSphere, Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology and Journal of Immunotherapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact