Nadja Bitomsky

570 citations
8 papers · 493 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

    • RNA Research and Splicing 3
    • Cell death mechanisms and regulation 2
    • Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways 2
    • Signaling Pathways in Disease 1
    • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms 1
    • Cancer-related Molecular Pathways 3

Nadja Bitomsky

8 papers receiving 489 citations

Peers

Nadja Bitomsky
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Cancer Research 130
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 26
  • Oncology 156
  • Molecular Biology 378
  • Cell Biology 50
Replace Mu-Shui Dai with:
Mu-Shui Dai United States
Thanh-Tuan Huynh Taiwan
Saul Carcamo United States
Rintaro Okoshi Japan
Stefania Vossio Switzerland
Hyun-Jin Shin South Korea
Yanan Li China
Manuel P. Jiménez-García Spain
Douglas B. Fox United States
Weizhi Xu China
Nadja Bitomsky relative to Mu-Shui Dai United States Mu-Shui Dai's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Mu-Shui Dai · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nadja Bitomsky

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nadja Bitomsky's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nadja Bitomsky with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nadja Bitomsky more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nadja Bitomsky

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nadja Bitomsky. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nadja Bitomsky. The network helps show where Nadja Bitomsky may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Nadja Bitomsky, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nadja Bitomsky Line = papers co-authored together Nadja Bitomsky links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 2004120
2 200985
3 201269
4 200868
5 201561
6 201344
7 200923
8 200923

About Nadja Bitomsky

Nadja Bitomsky is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Oncology, Epidemiology, Cell Biology and Cancer Research, having authored 8 papers that have together received 493 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (3 papers), RNA Research and Splicing (3 papers), Cell death mechanisms and regulation (2 papers), Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways (2 papers), Autophagy in Disease and Therapy (2 papers), Signaling Pathways in Disease (1 paper), Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism (1 paper) and RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (130 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (26 citations), Oncology (156 citations), Molecular Biology (378 citations) and Cell Biology (50 citations). Nadja Bitomsky has collaborated with scholars based in Germany and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Thomas G. Hofmann, Karl‐Heinz Klempnauer, Maret Böhm, Nils Wethkamp, K-H Klempnauer, Christoph Herbel, Jutta Moehlenbrink, Priyanka Singh, Sonja Matt and Eva Krieghoff‐Henning. Their work appears in journals such as Oncogene, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Cancer Letters, BioEssays and FEBS Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact