Nadia Breda
Impact in
-
- Forest ecology and management
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Atmospheric Science top 10%
- Tree-ring climate responses
- Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
Papers in
-
- Historical and Environmental Studies 6
-
- Environmental Philosophy and Ethics 2
- Co-authors
- Cécile Barbaroux (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Tree Physiology (1 paper)La Ricerca Folklorica (5 papers)Florence Research (University of Florence) (4 papers)DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (2 papers)Aisberg (University of Bergamo) (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- ItalyUnited StatesMorocco
In The Last Decade
Nadia Breda
10 papers receiving 377 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 198
- Atmospheric Science 250
- Global and Planetary Change 292
- Plant Science 124
- Geography, Planning and Development 9
Countries citing papers authored by Nadia Breda
This map shows the geographic impact of Nadia Breda's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nadia Breda with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nadia Breda more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nadia Breda
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nadia Breda. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nadia Breda. The network helps show where Nadia Breda may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 1 scholars most cited alongside Nadia Breda, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2002 | 372 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 7 | |
| 3 | 2006 | 3 | |
| 4 | Palù. Inquieti paesaggi tra natura e cultura | 2001 | 2 |
| 5 | La politica del campo. Sulla produzione di dati in antropologia | 2009 | 2 |
| 6 | 2005 | 2 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2003 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 12 | 1997 | 0 | |
| 13 | 2003 | 0 |
About Nadia Breda
Nadia Breda is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Economics and Econometrics, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and Archeology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 393 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical and Environmental Studies (6 papers), Diverse academic and cultural studies (3 papers), Environmental Philosophy and Ethics (2 papers), Urban Planning and Landscape Design (2 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (1 paper), Scientific and Historical Analyses (1 paper), Plant and Biological Electrophysiology Studies (1 paper) and Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (198 citations), Atmospheric Science (250 citations), Global and Planetary Change (292 citations), Plant Science (124 citations) and Geography, Planning and Development (9 citations). Nadia Breda has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United States and Morocco. Frequent co-authors include Cécile Barbaroux. Their work appears in journals such as Tree Physiology, La Ricerca Folklorica, Florence Research (University of Florence), DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) and Aisberg (University of Bergamo).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.