Nadia Bibi

799 citations
24 papers · 601 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Nadia Bibi

21 papers receiving 580 citations

Peers

Nadia Bibi
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Materials Chemistry 349
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 48
  • Pollution 53
  • Biomaterials 46
  • Biomedical Engineering 139
Replace Minha Naseer with:
Minha Naseer China
Sadia Kanwal Pakistan
Ayşe Demırbas Türkiye
R. Alok India
Aakash Gupta United States
Tijo Cherian India
K. Suganya India
Gudikandula Krishna India
Ľudmila Balážová Slovakia
Ola M. El‐Borady Egypt
Nadia Bibi relative to Minha Naseer China Minha Naseer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Minha Naseer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nadia Bibi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nadia Bibi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nadia Bibi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nadia Bibi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nadia Bibi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nadia Bibi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nadia Bibi. The network helps show where Nadia Bibi may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nadia Bibi, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nadia Bibi Line = papers co-authored together Nadia Bibi links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202198
2 202186
3 202266
4 202165
5 202255
6 202150
7
The Role of Motivation in Learning English Language for Pakistani Learners
201442
8 201835
9 202324
10 202219
11 202317
12 202215
13 20219
14
Simultaneous Equations Modeling for Terrorism, Poverty, and Economic Growth: Evidence from Pakistan
20174
15 20204
16 20243
17 20223
18 20222
19 20202
20 20221

About Nadia Bibi

Nadia Bibi is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering, Organic Chemistry, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Pharmacology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 601 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications (10 papers), Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications (3 papers), COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts (2 papers), Natural Antidiabetic Agents Studies (2 papers), Curcumin's Biomedical Applications (2 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (1 paper), Magnesium Oxide Properties and Applications (1 paper) and Advanced Battery Technologies Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Materials Chemistry (349 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (48 citations), Pollution (53 citations), Biomaterials (46 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (139 citations). Nadia Bibi has collaborated with scholars based in Pakistan, China and Saudi Arabia. Frequent co-authors include Shah Faisal, Muhammad Rizwan, Abdullah Abdullah, Zahid Hussain, Muhammad Nazir Uddin, Aishma Khattak, Muhammad Idrees, Zobia Afsheen, Hasnain Jan and Riaz Ullah. Their work appears in journals such as Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C Toxicology & Pharmacology, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, Microscopy Research and Technique and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact