Nabil Arrach

653 citations
14 papers · 505 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Nabil Arrach

14 papers receiving 493 citations

Peers

Nabil Arrach
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Biotechnology 146
  • Biochemistry 71
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 128
  • Endocrinology 29
  • Food Science 69
Replace K. K. Oishi with:
K. K. Oishi United States
Haruhiko Washida Japan
Gwenaël Ruprich‐Robert France
Hiroaki Yamanouchi Japan
Charles C. Carey United States
Yin Song China
Viktor Uršič Slovenia
K L Perry United States
Jinlin Li China
Ching-San Chen Taiwan
Nabil Arrach relative to K. K. Oishi United States K. K. Oishi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×18.3×
K. K. Oishi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nabil Arrach

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nabil Arrach's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nabil Arrach with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nabil Arrach more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nabil Arrach

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nabil Arrach. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nabil Arrach. The network helps show where Nabil Arrach may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nabil Arrach, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nabil Arrach Line = papers co-authored together Nabil Arrach links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 200193
2 201886
3 200865
4 201058
5 200248
6 201042
7 200834
8 201825
9 202424
10 201922
11 20154
12 20142
13 20171
14 20171

About Nabil Arrach

Nabil Arrach is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Molecular Biology, Genetics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Biotechnology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 505 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (6 papers), Renal and related cancers (3 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (3 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (3 papers), Cancer Research and Treatments (2 papers), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (2 papers), Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (2 papers) and Virus-based gene therapy research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biotechnology (146 citations), Biochemistry (71 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (128 citations), Endocrinology (29 citations) and Food Science (69 citations). Nabil Arrach has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Spain and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Javier Ávalos, Michael McClelland, R. Fernández-Martín, Enrique Cerdá‐Olmedo, Robert M. Hoffman, Ming Zhao, Steffen Porwollik, Thomas J. Schmidhauser, Richard J. Paulson and Karine Chung. Their work appears in journals such as Fertility and Sterility, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, Cancer Research, Molecular Genetics and Genomics and Birth Defects Research Part C Embryo Today Reviews.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact