Na Wei

2.1k citations
110 papers · 1.5k · h-index 24

Impact in

  • Hematology top 5%
    • Autoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders Research
    • Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery

Papers in

Na Wei

99 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Na Wei
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
  • Hematology 233
  • Biomaterials 221
  • Pharmaceutical Science 85
  • Immunology 196
  • Cancer Research 120
Replace Yanira Riffo‐Vasquez with:
Yanira Riffo‐Vasquez United Kingdom
Rothwelle J. Tate United Kingdom
Manasa K. Nayak United States
Raheleh Farahzadi Iran
Jingjing Wang China
Yan Wu China
Roberta Piva Italy
László Dézsi Hungary
Weiping Zheng China
Zhengquan Yu China
Na Wei relative to Yanira Riffo‐Vasquez United Kingdom Yanira Riffo‐Vasquez's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
Yanira Riffo‐Vasquez · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Na Wei

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Na Wei's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Na Wei with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Na Wei more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Na Wei

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Na Wei. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Na Wei. The network helps show where Na Wei may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Na Wei, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Na Wei Line = papers co-authored together Na Wei links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 110 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015134
2 201593
3 201473
4 201657
5 202356
6 201249
7 201543
8 202142
9 200841
10 201839
11 201437
12 201737
13 201836
14 201935
15 201734
16 201434
17 201532
18 201630
19 201127
20 200926

About Na Wei

Na Wei is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Hematology, Oncology, Infectious Diseases and Immunology, having authored 110 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Autoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders Research (15 papers), Immune Cell Function and Interaction (10 papers), Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery (9 papers), Parvovirus B19 Infection Studies (7 papers), RNA Interference and Gene Delivery (5 papers), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (4 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers) and Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Hematology (233 citations), Biomaterials (221 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (85 citations), Immunology (196 citations) and Cancer Research (120 citations). Na Wei has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Yini Wang, JingXia Cui, Zhao Wang, Chunlei Li, Yanhui Li, Caixia Wang, Lihong Li, Xinan Cen, Jijun Wang and Liangding Hu. Their work appears in journals such as Blood, International Journal of Pharmaceutics, International Immunopharmacology, Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology and Cardiovascular Diabetology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact