N. Serradell

617 citations
77 papers · 490 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

N. Serradell

76 papers receiving 455 citations

Peers

N. Serradell
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Organic Chemistry 193
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 41
  • Pharmacology 34
  • Pharmaceutical Science 14
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 28
Replace Atsu Apedo with:
Atsu Apedo United States
Adam D. Shilling United States
Daisy Pireh United States
Catherine Sekerke United States
Charles David Jones United States
Zhengping Ma United States
Toshiaki Sakamoto Japan
Zhihong O’Brien United States
Philip D. Stein United States
Hanan S. Anbar Egypt
N. Serradell relative to Atsu Apedo United States Atsu Apedo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.3×
Atsu Apedo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by N. Serradell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of N. Serradell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N. Serradell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N. Serradell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by N. Serradell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by N. Serradell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N. Serradell. The network helps show where N. Serradell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside N. Serradell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with N. Serradell Line = papers co-authored together N. Serradell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 77 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200746
2 200527
3 200725
4 200724
5 200617
6 200616
7 200716
8 200614
9 200713
10 200612
11 200712
12 200611
13 200610
14 200710
15 20069
16 20069
17 20079
18
The year's new drugs and biologics--2007.
20089
19 20068
20 20078

About N. Serradell

N. Serradell is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Hematology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Oncology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 77 papers that have together received 490 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Treatment of Major Depression (6 papers), Synthesis and biological activity (6 papers), Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (4 papers), Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery (3 papers), Asthma and respiratory diseases (3 papers), HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment (3 papers), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (3 papers) and Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (193 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (41 citations), Pharmacology (34 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (14 citations) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (28 citations). Frequent co-authors include Jordi De Bolós, L.A. Sorbera, Lisa Ann Sorbera, M. Bayés, Peter A. Revill, J. Prous, Gordon J.S. Rustin, Daniel M. Patterson, Ginés Escolar and Laura Revel. Their work appears in journals such as Drugs of the Future and PubMed.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact