N. Phillips

1.4k citations
37 papers · 1.2k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

N. Phillips

36 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

N. Phillips
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Microbiology 270
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 176
  • Reproductive Medicine 92
  • Cancer Research 157
  • Endocrinology 49
Replace Nancy Wertz with:
Nancy Wertz United States
Ashok Aiyar United States
Elisabetta Antuofermo Italy
Tobias Paprotka Germany
Takuo Mizukami Japan
M. K. Singh India
S. M. Dennis United States
K. Perk Israel
N Goldblum Israel
N. Phillips relative to Nancy Wertz United States Nancy Wertz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.9×
Nancy Wertz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by N. Phillips

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of N. Phillips's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N. Phillips with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N. Phillips more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by N. Phillips

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by N. Phillips. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N. Phillips. The network helps show where N. Phillips may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside N. Phillips, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with N. Phillips Line = papers co-authored together N. Phillips links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Allelotyping of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: deletion of loci on 8p, 13q, 16q, 17p and 17q.
1995147
2 1993135
3 2004102
4
Allelic deletion on chromosome 17p13.3 in early ovarian cancer.
199695
5 200084
6 199764
7
Allelic loss and the progression of breast cancer.
199564
8 199262
9 200248
10 200343
11 199942
12 199941
13 201339
14 199435
15 200930
16 200729
17 200122
18 199920
19 200919
20 201115

About N. Phillips

N. Phillips is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Molecular Biology, Genetics, Reproductive Medicine and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 37 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (12 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (5 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (4 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (4 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (3 papers), Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (3 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (3 papers) and Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Microbiology (270 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (176 citations), Reproductive Medicine (92 citations), Cancer Research (157 citations) and Endocrinology (49 citations). N. Phillips has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Bradford W. Gibson, Michael A. Apicella, Helen Donis-Keller, Diane M. Radford, Keri Fair, William Melaugh, Anthony A. Campagnari, T. Steinbrueck, Jon H. Ritter and Michael McGowan. Their work appears in journals such as Animal Reproduction Science, Infection and Immunity, Journal of Bacteriology, animal and The Journal of Immunology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact