N. E. Williams

873 citations
43 papers · 596 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

N. E. Williams

40 papers receiving 508 citations

Peers

N. E. Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 187
  • Developmental Neuroscience 21
  • Pharmacology 71
  • Pharmaceutical Science 26
  • Pharmacology 33
Replace T.N. Calvey with:
T.N. Calvey United Kingdom
Ronald R. Tuttle United States
D. Arndts Germany
Michael Cwik United States
J. A. Jansen Denmark
Chris Garratt United Kingdom
R. G. Moore Australia
L. E. Martin United Kingdom
G Faucon France
S Takki Finland
N. E. Williams relative to T.N. Calvey United Kingdom T.N. Calvey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
T.N. Calvey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by N. E. Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of N. E. Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N. E. Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N. E. Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by N. E. Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by N. E. Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N. E. Williams. The network helps show where N. E. Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside N. E. Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with N. E. Williams Line = papers co-authored together N. E. Williams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198567
2 197659
3 200855
4 198039
5 197839
6 197438
7 198824
8 199523
9 198320
10 198119
11 199918
12 198318
13 197617
14 196816
15 197816
16 197515
17 199714
18
Pain relief and pituitary function following injection of alcohol into the pituitary fossa.
198011
19 199711
20 19838

About N. E. Williams

N. E. Williams is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Surgery, Molecular Biology, Pharmacology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 43 papers that have together received 596 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anesthesia and Pain Management (14 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (11 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (7 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (6 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (4 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (4 papers), Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (4 papers) and Pharmacological Receptor Mechanisms and Effects (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (187 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (21 citations), Pharmacology (71 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (26 citations) and Pharmacology (33 citations). N. E. Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include T.N. Calvey, Kelvin Y.K. Chan, G. R. Murray, Priyanka Mishra, J. D. Baty, Serge Duckett, Sampson Lipton, M. D. D. Bell, John J. Miles and K.C. Allen Chan. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Anaesthesia, European Journal of Anaesthesiology, Anaesthesia, The Lancet and International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact