N. Dieringer

4.2k citations
77 papers · 3.7k · h-index 35

Impact in

Papers in

N. Dieringer

75 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Peers

N. Dieringer
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Neurology 2.4k
  • Sensory Systems 811
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.3k
  • Ophthalmology 464
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.0k
Replace Werner Graf with:
Werner Graf United States
Neal H. Barmack United States
D. W. F. Schwarz Canada
S. M. Highstein United States
J. I. Simpson United States
Mayank B. Dutia United Kingdom
Craig Evinger United States
R. A. McCrea United States
Chris R. S. Kaneko United States
C. A. Scudder United States
N. Dieringer relative to Werner Graf United States Werner Graf's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Werner Graf · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by N. Dieringer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of N. Dieringer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N. Dieringer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N. Dieringer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by N. Dieringer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by N. Dieringer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N. Dieringer. The network helps show where N. Dieringer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside N. Dieringer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with N. Dieringer Line = papers co-authored together N. Dieringer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 77 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995227
2 1982185
3 1979176
4 1980149
5 1984149
6
Neuronal events paralleling functional recovery (compensation) following peripheral vestibular lesions.
1985141
7 1983133
8 1988131
9 1979119
10 1981112
11 1986110
12 1987108
13 199393
14 199589
15 199188
16 197788
17 199179
18 198073
19 199064
20 197861

About N. Dieringer

N. Dieringer is a scholar working on Neurology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Molecular Biology and Sensory Systems, having authored 77 papers that have together received 3.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Vestibular and auditory disorders (54 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (26 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (16 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (14 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (11 papers), Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (11 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (11 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (2.4k citations), Sensory Systems (811 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (1.3k citations), Ophthalmology (464 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.0k citations). N. Dieringer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include W. Precht, Hans Straka, S.L. Cochran, Bernhard Hess, W. M. King, Thomas Knöpfel, H. Straka, J. Koester, I. Reichenberger and Victor J. Wilson. Their work appears in journals such as Experimental Brain Research, Journal of Neurophysiology, Journal of Comparative Physiology A, Brain Research and The Journal of Comparative Neurology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact